Canada's ambassador in Ukraine Roman Waschuk, flanked by Canadian soldiers, participates in a ceremony of consecrating a monument to 17 members of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN) reportedly executed in 1944 by Gestapo at a Jewish cemetery in the town of Sambir, in Western Ukraine. Photo taken on Aug. 21, 2019. (Sambir municipal council/Facebook)

Canada accused of promoting Holocaust revisionism with memorial in Ukraine

It was supposed to be an event promoting greater understanding between Ukrainians and Jews, an ecumenical service attended by top Ukrainian and Jewish religious leaders meant to mark a new beginning in the sometimes painful shared history of the two communities.

Instead, a controversial monument built in the western Ukrainian town of Sambir, funded through Canadian private donations and consecrated with the help of Canada’s envoy in Ukraine, opened up old wounds and raised questions about whether Ottawa is complicit in a campaign to whitewash a horrific chapter of Ukraine’s Second World War history.

The monument is a large granite cross erected on the grounds of a derelict Jewish cemetery, where more than 1,200 Jews were shot and dumped into mass graves in 1943 by the Nazis and their Ukrainian collaborators. It’s dedicated to the memory of 17 Ukrainian nationalists executed by the Gestapo in 1944 (however, some historians question the official version of the execution, saying that it’s highly unlikely that Gestapo would have executed these fighters at a time when Ukrainian nationalist organizations had resumed collaboration with the Nazis).

Flanked by Canadian soldiers, Canada’s ambassador to Ukraine Roman Waschuk took part in the Aug. 21 ceremony to unveil the monument dedicated to executed members of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN) and its military wing, the Ukrainian Insurgent Army, known by the Ukrainian acronym UPA.

The event was organized by Ukrainian Jewish Encounter (UJE), a Canadian-based private initiative founded by Ukrainian-Canadian philanthropist James Temerty and aimed at strengthening “mutual comprehension and solidarity between Ukrainians and Jews.”

The ceremony, which also included the consecration of a future memorial to the Jewish victims of the Holocaust in Sambir, was attended by the heads of the newly independent Ukrainian Orthodox Church, the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church and the Chief Rabbi of Ukraine, as well as a number of regional and municipal politicians.

‘A blatant insult’

Canada’s ambassador in Ukraine Roman Waschuk, the heads of the newly independent Ukrainian Orthodox Church, the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church and the Chief Rabbi of Ukraine, as well as a number of regional and municipal politicians participate in a ceremony of consecrating a monument to 17 members of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN) reportedly executed in 1944 by Gestapo at a Jewish cemetery in the town of Sambir, in Western Ukraine. Photo taken on Aug. 21, 2019. (Sambir municipal council/Facebook)

But critics of the event say erecting a cross dedicated to members of OUN-UPA – an anti-Semitic organization that actively collaborated with the Nazis during much of the Second World War – in the middle of a Jewish cemetery amounts to desecration and a crude attempt to rewrite history.

“It’s a blatant insult to the memory of the Jewish victims,” Eduard Dolinsky, head of the Ukrainian Jewish Committee, told Radio Canada International in a phone interview from Kyiv.

“It’s like erecting a monument to murderers on the graves of their victims.”

Dolinksy said the participation in the dedication ceremony of Canadian diplomats and soldiers, as well as Ukrainian religious leaders, was particularly troubling.

“But most of all I’m perturbed by this desecration,” he said. “This is so outrageously cynical.”

‘A necessary compromise’

First row from right to left) Mark Freiman, a member of the board of directors of UJE, Ukraine’s Chief Rabbi Yaakov Dov Bleich, Major Archbishop and the Head of the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church Sviatoslav, Metropolitan Epiphanius, the primate of the Orthodox Church of Ukraine, Ukrainian-Canadian philanthropist James Temerty and Canada’s ambassador in Ukraine Roman Waschuk, participate in a ceremony of consecrating the ‘Remember Memorial Park’ project in Sambir, Ukraine. Photo taken on Aug. 21, 2019. (Sambir municipal council/Facebook)

Mark Freiman is a member of the board of directors of UJE and a former president of the Canadian Jewish Congress; his parents were among the roughly 100 Jews who survived the Jewish massacres in Sambir. He said building a monument dedicated to executed OUN-UPA members was part of “a necessary compromise” required to secure the support of the local community after years of unsuccessful attempts to build a memorial to the 1,200 Jews who were executed there on the first day of Passover in 1943.

“My understanding is there absolutely no evidence that they [the 17 Ukrainian nationalists] participated in any anti-Jewish activities, I haven’t seen any such information,” Freiman, who was in Sambir to take part in the ceremony, told Radio Canada International in a phone interview from Ukraine.

Previous attempts to create a memorial park for the Jewish victims of the 1943 Passover massacre, and the July 1, 1941 Sambir pogrom carried out by Ukrainian nationalists, failed because of fierce opposition from modern-day Ukrainian nationalists in the area.

In 2000, Jewish-Canadian philanthropist Jack Gardner, who was born in Sambir, tried to rehabilitate the cemetery and erect a large Star of David monument as a tribute to the Jews buried at the site.

But the move infuriated local nationalists who vandalized the monument and erected three 10-metre-high wooden crosses around the perimeter of the Jewish cemetery and mass grave.

One of those crosses has been taken down as part of the deal to build the memorial to the executed Ukrainian nationalists – which itself was a precondition for building a memorial park to honour the Jewish victims, Freiman said.

The two remaining crosses are expected to come down as well, he said.

“We anticipate that the Jewish cemetery will become a memorial park. The memorial to the Jewish victims will occupy about a hundred metres in front of the mass grave, which is being restored,” said Freiman.

“And we hope it would be a place of pilgrimage for people all over the world to learn about the ‘Holocaust by bullets’ and the terrible events that occurred.”

The monument to the 17 OUN-UPA activists will be kept separate from the memorial park, he added.

“I can’t prevent Ukrainians from remembering from their vision of history, but I would be very uneasy about such a monument in Canada,” Freiman said.

“There are sometimes compromises that need to be made in order to pave the way for monuments that Jewish people need to put for their own victims. And it may not always be possible to have a perfect solution to all problems.”

Dolinsky said he’d prefer no Jewish monument at all to one built on the basis of revisionist history.

“It was a so-called deal with the devil,” Dolinksy said. “They thought that they’d substitute one disgrace by another but it didn’t work out that way.”

Troubling history

Veterans of the Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA) take part in a rally in Kyiv on Oct. 14, 2016 to celebrate the Defender of Ukraine Day and the creation of UPA. (Genya Savilov/AFP/Getty Images)

Ivan Katchanovski, a Ukrainian researcher who teaches political science at the University of Ottawa, said that while there was some degree of conflict between OUN-UPA and the Nazis, the reported execution of 17 nationalists was an exceptional event that is now being used to present the Ukrainian nationalists as valiant freedom fighters who fought both the Soviets and the Germans for an independent Ukraine.

“OUN and UPA were basically radical nationalist, semi-fascist organizations,” Katchanovski said. “OUN had elements of fascist ideology, totalitarian ideology, one-party dictatorship in which they would be the ruling party.”

OUN’s ideology called for the creation of a racially pure Ukraine, free of ethnic minorities such as Jews, Russians and Poles, Katchanovski said.

While OUN and UPA conducted some limited operations against the Germans, their main war effort was focused on the the Polish population of Western Ukraine in 1943 and 1944, as well as fighting Soviet partisans, Katchanovski said.

Historians estimate UPA killed between 60,000 and 100,000 ethnic Poles in a mass campaign of ethnic cleansing in the Volhyn and Galicia regions of Western Ukraine.

Swedish historian Per Anders Rudling, who is writing a book on the politics of memory in Ukraine, said the monument unveiling event in Sambir was more about contemporary Ukrainian politics and nationalist mythmaking than setting the historical record straight.

“The idea, which is important to contemporary Ukrainian politics, is to present the Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA), as enemies and opponents of the Nazis, not as collaborators,” Rudling said.

“There have been a number of places across Western Ukraine where they have sort of appropriated the perceived moral capital of the suffering of the Jews for political purposes.”

The ceremony in Sambir was another attempt to sanitize the past, he said.

“They try to pass off Ukrainian nationalists as somehow sharing the plight of the Jews, when in reality the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists was actively involved in mass murder of Jews,” Rudling said in a phone interview from Sweden.

Ukrainian-Canadian historian John-Paul Himka, who has extensively researched Ukrainian nationalist movements during the Second World War, said that instead of dabbling in revisionist mythmaking, the Canadian government should be working behind the scenes to encourage the new Ukrainian government to come to terms with its history.

“I also don’t think that Canada should participate in monuments to these people, because they were war criminals,” Himka said. “It’s very clear.”

Rudling and Himka said they believe Waschuk’s presence at the ceremony in Sambir is partly due to his potential exposure to the prevailing nationalist myths while growing up in the Ukrainian-Canadian community.

Many of the displaced Ukrainians who came to Canada after the Second World War, including Waschuk’s parents, were refugees from Western Ukraine, which was a hotbed of the OUN and UPA support, said Rudling.

Ukrainian intellectuals who were tied to the OUN had a very powerful influence on the life of the community in Canada, including on key organizations such as the Ukrainina Canadian Congress that has built monuments to OUN and UPA members in Canada and has been pushing for a revisionist view of their wartime record, said Himka.

Their views of Ukrainian history were exported back to Ukraine after the country became independent in 1991, but particularly after the 2004 Orange Revolution, Himka said.

Global Affairs Canada declined a request from Radio Canada International for an interview with Ambassador Waschuk.

Officials with Global Affairs Canada also did not provide a copy of Waschuk’s speech at the monument unveiling in time for publication.

Temerty, founder of Ukrainian Jewish Encounter, could not be reached for comment.

Categories: International, Politics
Tags: , , , ,

Do you want to report an error or a typo? Click here!

@*@ Comments

Leave a Reply

Note: By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that Radio Canada International has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Radio Canada International does not endorse any of the views posted. Your comments will be pre-moderated and published if they meet Netiquette guidelines.

When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don’t always think alike—and that’s precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it’s important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1.’s online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3.’s online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in five languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish or in one of the two official languages, English or French. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  10. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  11. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International  is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  12. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  13. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International  forums is prohibited.
  14. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  15. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  16. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  17. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  18. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


4 comments on “Canada accused of promoting Holocaust revisionism with memorial in Ukraine
  1. Avatar Louis Petrovsky says:

    The Jewish community – and, yes, that includes the Rabbi concerned – should have anticipated that a revisinist spin would predominate this event and that they should have completely shunned it from the outset. This article fails to discuss what Ukrainian nationalists (and the majority of the Ukrainian people) have always argued – that it was the Ukrainians who were the victims and that substantial numbers of Jews had participated, at the ighest levels, in what Ukrainians cynically refer to as the “Holodomor” (total destruction by famine) – the mass starvation of Ukrainians by the Stalinist communists in the early 1930s – in which, they claim, as many as 2 million Ukrainians were starved to death. Jews who choose to continue living in Ukraine need to be reminded that they are an unprotected minority in the country of their choice, and when the going really gets tough again one day, it will be they who will be scapegoated for the latest national disaster, just as Jews have been blamed everywhere else on such occasions. The notion that anyone can unshape whatever version of history the Ukrainians or any other majority nationality chooses to teach themselves is absurd and completely unrealistic.

  2. Avatar Brian Farrell says:

    I wrote a reply to Mr Serbyn, a frequent public apologist for Ukrainian collaborators with the Nazis. You allowed him to impugn the probity of three respected scholars but you did not allow me to respond to him, you rejected my reply. Please explain. He is not immune from criticism and rebuttal.

  3. Avatar Roman Serbyn says:

    This is a very irresponsible article by Mr. Levon Sevunts, who as an experienced journalist should know better how to check the facts of an event and how to verify claims of biased commentators, even if they happen to be academics. Very disappointing. I expect better performance in their journalistic obligations of CBC news media.
    Please see Sasha Nazar’s Facebook – the last posting, which begins with this paragraph:
    “n the last couple of days I’ve come across a large amount of negative press, both in the Jewish sources and the social media, regarding the ceremony of August 21st in Sambir. As a participant in that ceremony, I would like to refute some of the deliberately twisted and taken out of context facts.”
    and continues:
    ” So, let’s start. It’s not clear to me why no one is mentioning that the ceremony on August 21 at the Jewish cemetery in Sambir had consisted of 2 parts.

    The first part was the consecration of the Cross, which was conducted by priests led by the patriarchs of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church and the UGCC.
    The second part was a ceremony and a memorial prayer at the Jewish mass grave where around 1,500 Jews are buried, the prayer and the ceremony were conducted by chief rabbi Jacob Dov Bleich.”

    Worth reading to the end

    • Avatar Brian Farrell says:

      It is a very accurate analysis supported by the authoritative evaluations of serious scholars such as Rudling and Himka. Mr. Serbyns biased nationalist knee jerk reactions are what is not credible. We have had enough apologies for fellow travelers. Ukrainians have to face hard facts about 1941-45. Serbyn type denials won’t do that.