Iceland's foreign minister Gunnar Bragi Sveinsson, with an icelandic flag behind him.

Gunnar Bragi Sveinsson, Iceland’s minister for foreign affairs and external trade: ”If five of eight Arctic states decide to make some kind of declaration without discussing it with the other three, is it something we are going to see more of in the Arctic Council? I think it is not a good sign,” he says. (Jussi Nukari/Lehtikuva/AP)

Iceland blasts Canada, rest of Arctic Five, for exclusion from fishing agreement

 Iceland says the recent Arctic fishing moratorium, signed by the five Arctic coastal states without Iceland’s participation, is ‘unacceptable’ and a worrying precedent.

“We have been able to have good cooperation between the eight (circumpolar) countries and it has been a success – until now,” said Gunnar Bragi Sveinsson, Iceland’s minister for foreign affairs and external trade, in an interview with Radio Canada International’s Eye on the Arctic this week.

“I hope, of course, that it will be a success in the future. But this is not a good sign for the future if some states are going to make declarations without the others.”

In this week’s Eye on the Arctic Feature Interview, Eilís Quinn speaks with Gunnar Bragi Sveinsson,Iceland’s minister for foreign affairs and external trade, about the Arctic fishing moratorium and its implications for Arctic cooperation:

Iceland, Finland, Sweden excluded

The five Arctic coastal states, known as the Arctic Five, include Canada, Denmark, Norway, Russia and the United States.

Those countries, along with Iceland, Finland and Sweden, also make up the Arctic Council.

The international forum was set up to foster cooperation between the eight circumpolar nations on issues like environment and sustainable development.

The group has had a number of achievements since its inception including agreements on marine oil pollution preparedness and search and rescue.

However, the fishing moratorium was arrived at by the Arctic Five, outside of the Council, and without Iceland, Finland and Sweden’s participation.

While Finland, and Sweden have no Arctic coastline, Iceland has long argued as it should be included in discussions on Arctic fishing given the island nation’s location,  fishing industry and scientific research into sustainable marine environments.

“In Iceland we have a profitable fishing industry without any subsidies, ” Sveinsson said. “We have sustainable fishing stocks around the island that we’ve been building up over three decades . Our system has been recognized as preventing overfishing and building profitable companies. We have a lot to offer to the conversation.”

Ambassadors summoned

Last week,  Iceland’s Foreign Ministery called in the ambassadors of Canada, Denmark, Norway, Russia and the United States to voice its displeasure with the agreement.

“I think it should be obvious to most of the nations why Iceland is unhappy,” Sveinsson told Eye on the Arctic.

“We have been advocating for the oceans, for sustainable fisheries for years. We are among the leading fishing nations and no Arctic coastal state depends as much on fisheries as Iceland.”

“For those five states, if they are serious about having some kind of control, or whatever they are thinking about in the central Arctic Ocean, Iceland should be around that table.”

Sveinsson said Iceland had not received an answer on why it’s been excluded from the five states’ discussions.

“For us (exclusion from the agreement is) a decision that is not appreciated in Iceland and it needs to be clarified,” he said.

Troubling implications

In news releases issued this month by  the Arctic Five about the moratorium, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Russia and the United States pledged to work together with other countries concerned about unregulated fishing in the Arctic.

“We acknowledge the interest of other States in preventing unregulated high seas fisheries in the central Arctic Ocean and look forward to working with them in a broader process to develop measures consistent with this Declaration that would include commitments by all interested States,” it said.

But Iceland calls this unacceptable and characterized it as a strange way at working towards consensus.

“We should ask ourselves the question: What does this mean?,” Sveinsson said. “If five of eight Arctic states decide to make some kind of declaration without discussing it with the other three, is it something we are going to see more of in the Arctic Council? I think it is not a good sign.”

The United States currently holds the Arctic Council’s two-year rotating chairmanship.

They did not respond to Eye on the Arctic’s request for comment on the issue.

Agreement praised

Environmental conditions currently preclude commercial fishing in the central Arctic Ocean, but climate change has opened the possibility  that could change in future.

In 2012, more than 2,000 scientists from around the world signed an open letter calling for a moratorium on commercial fishing in the Arctic.

When the Arctic Five signed the fishing agreement this month it was widely praised.

The Inuit Circumpolar Council, an international organization of Inuit from Canada, Greenland, Russia and the United States, have been strong advocates for a moratorium on commercial fishing in the central Arctic Ocean until a sustainable management plan is in place and were involved  in discussions with the five coastal states on the issue.

“Inuit welcome this announcement and have a great deal of traditional knowledge about these stocks to share”, said  Duane Smith, President of ICC – Canada, in a news release about the moratorium earlier this month.

The agreement, signed in Oslo on July 16, was also praised by many for taking a longview approach to environmental protection.

Write to Eilís Quinn at eilis.quinn(at)

Related stories from around the North:

Asia:  Asia ahead on preparing for polar climate change, says U.S. Arctic rep, Eye on the Arctic

Canada:  The return of the Arctic Five, Blog by Heather Exner-Pirot

China: China’s silk road plans could challenge Northern Sea Route, Blog by Mia Bennett

Finland: US seeks Finnish support for Arctic goals, Yle News

Greenland: Arctic countries ban fishing around North Pole, Alaska Dispatch News

Norway:  China eyes Arctic Norway infrastructure projects, Barents Observer

Russia:  The Arctic Council’s Immunity to Crimean Flu, Blog by Heather Exner-Pirot

Sweden:   Arctic Council – From looking out to looking in, Blog by Mia Bennett, Cryopolitics

United States:  Arctic Alaska meeting planned for Kerry, Lavrov and other officials, Alaska Dispatch News


Tagged with: , , , , , ,
Posted in Economy, Indigenous, International, Society

Do you want to report an error or a typo? Click here!

@*@ Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available

Note: By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that Radio Canada International has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Radio Canada International does not endorse any of the views posted. Your comments will be pre-moderated and published if they meet netiquette guidelines.

Netiquette »

When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don’t always think alike—and that’s precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it’s important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1.’s online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3.’s online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in five languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  10. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  11. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International  is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  12. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  13. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International  forums is prohibited.
  14. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  15. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  16. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  17. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  18. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.


One comment on “Iceland blasts Canada, rest of Arctic Five, for exclusion from fishing agreement
  1. Peter Ashcroft says:

    I sympathise with Iceland with its exclusion from this fishing agreement as it has a fishing-reliant economy.