The Peace Bridge, seen from the Canadian side, crosses the Niagara River, connecting Fort Erie, Ontario to Buffalo, New York in t he United States. This is one of the possible routes 150 trucks carrying liquid radioactive waste might travel.
Photo Credit: wikipedia

Radioactive liquid nuclear waste: stop the transport


Radioactive liquid nuclear waste could be transported by armed convoy, 1100 miles over the Great Lakes water system from Chalk River, Ontario to the Savannah River Site in South Carolina for the first time, and it could begin as soon as September.

That’s if a challenge by seven nonprofit groups filed on August 12, 2016, is unsuccessful. The coalition is requesting an injunction from the federal court in Washington, DC, to halt the transport until an adequate environmental impact statement is completed.

In 2012, at the nuclear security summit, then Prime Minister Stephen Harper commited to returning highly enriched uranium (HEU) inventories, to the United States, to reduce the risk of nuclear terrorism. The threat of an act of terrorism en route has not been adequately factored into the decision, considering the rise of ISIL since 2012.

“a mobile Chernobyl on steroids”

Gordon Edwards, president of the Canadian Coalition for Nuclear Responsibility was part of a telephone briefing by the coalition earlier today. Advocates from Canada and the United States voiced their concerns and opposition.


“In the 75 years of the nuclear enterprise in North America this highly radioactive liquid waste has never been transported over public roads even though they have millions of gallons of this stuff in three different sites in the United States, and it’s regarded as the most toxic radioactive material really on earth.” Edwards says.

Kevin Kamps, of the Radioactive Waste Watchdog, Beyond Nuclear, based in Maryland in the United States described the idea as “a mobile Chernobyl on steroids”

Gordon Edwards says that’s because this liquid waste is like the spent nuclear fuel that caused the meltdown in Chernobyl and the triple meltdown in Fukushima.

“a kind of a witches brew of radioactive materials”

“This is irradiated uranium which has been dissolved in nitirc acid and therefore converted to a liquid form so that we have dozens, many dozens of radioactive materials in this mixture, it’s a kind of a witches brew of radioactive materials, all of the materials that are in spent nuclear fuel can be found in this liquid waste which is in one tank at Chalk River, Ontario, called the FISST tank, it stands for Fissile Solution Storage Tank, 23000 litres, that’s 6,000 gallons and that’s what they want to transport in 100 to 150 truckloads over a period of several years.”

Edwards say it is totally unecessary. He says the tank has been full since 2003, the result of producing medical isotopes, and for the last 13 years, they have been solidifying this material on site. He says when Chalk River got its license in 2011 they said that they would be solidifying it and downblending it to remove the security risk.

Asked why there is no outcry in Canada, why there is no injunction being sought here to prevent the transportation, Gordon Edwards points to the gutting of the environmental safety legislation that took place under the Harper governmnent.

The Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) is supposed to be an independant body, but Edwards recalls the firing of the head of this organization, Linda Keen, for trying to enforce their own regulations.

The new head of the CNSC, Michael Binder, has said his mission is to “streamline the approvals process”, according to Edwards. He says we have a problem in Canada where the industry and the regulator are very much on the same wavelength, and the public has no say in any of these matters.

Catherine McKenna, the new federal Minister of the Environment established a four-member panel to review Canada’s environmental assessment process, but Edwards says it is not likely the panel will have reported back in time to have any bearing on this imminent issue.

For now, keeping the trucks from Chalk River, Ontario, from rolling out, under armed guard, remains in the hands of the U.S. federal court.

Posted in Economy, Health, International, Internet, Science and Technology, Politics

Do you want to report an error or a typo? Click here!

@*@ Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available

Note: By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that Radio Canada International has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Radio Canada International does not endorse any of the views posted. Your comments will be pre-moderated and published if they meet netiquette guidelines.

Netiquette »

When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don’t always think alike—and that’s precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it’s important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1.’s online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3.’s online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in five languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  10. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  11. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International  is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  12. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  13. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International  forums is prohibited.
  14. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  15. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  16. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  17. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  18. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.


One comment on “Radioactive liquid nuclear waste: stop the transport
  1. Michael Miller says:

    Some key words- “and the public has no say in these matters” – these decisions by the Canadian government led by Harper have cleared the way for all this transportation of spent nuclear fuel. So legally, at least in Canada, the trucks can roll whenever.