Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, left, takes part in a bilateral meeting with U.S. President Barack Obama at the APEC Summit in Manila, Philippines on Thursday, November 19, 2015.

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, left, takes part in a bilateral meeting with U.S. President Barack Obama at the APEC Summit in Manila, Philippines on Thursday, November 19, 2015.
Photo Credit: PC / Sean Kilpatrick

Small businesses want Trudeau to address customs red tape in meeting with Obama


Canada’s largest association of small- and medium-sized businesses says it wants Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to raise the issue of red tape at the U.S.-Canada border during his upcoming meeting with President Barack Obama in March.

In a newly released report the Canadian Federation of Independent Business (CFIB) said Monday red tape at the U.S.-Canada border is so bad it’s causing many Canadian small business owners to rethink their plans to trade across the U.S. border.

“What our members are telling us is that it seems to be easier for them to import goods and services to Canada than it is for them to export to the United States,” said CFIB vice-president Satinder Chera. “This is one of the reasons we are encouraging Prime Minister Trudeau and President Obama to make this priority at their upcoming meeting, because if we’re saying we truly have free trade in place, then we need to make sure that it works for everyone.”

(click to listen to the interview with Satinder Chera)


In order for small businesses to succeed they need support from both sides of the border, Chera said.

“In this shaky economy, what are some of the inexpensive things that we can do to support businesses in Canada?” Chera said. “We would say the free trade, making it red-tape free hassle would be one easy way to make that happen.”

‘Paper burden’
 Trucks hauling cargo from Canada through the United States to Mexico make their way to Wyoming Highway 30 on Tuesday, April 21, 2015, in Laramie, Wyo.
Trucks hauling cargo from Canada through the United States to Mexico make their way to Wyoming Highway 30 on Tuesday, April 21, 2015, in Laramie, Wyo. © PC/Jeremy Martin

The CFIB report is based on 8600 responses from small business owners, said Chera.

“What we found really worrisome is that one-third of business owners that we surveyed said that if they had known about the costs associated with trading with the U.S., they would not have gone into trading in the first place,” Chera said. “Which begs the question, how many businesses have given up or not even tried to trade with our largest trading partner because of the costs associated at the border?”

About 60 per cent of respondents said they had to raise the prices for their goods and services in Canada because of red tape and various fees, Chera said.

Thirty-six per cent of responders pointed to administrative hassles and lack of transparency around fees as forcing them to reduce the frequency at which they currently trade, Chera said.

“It’s the myriad of different rules and forms that businesses have to fill out to enter any transaction, whether it’s at home or internationally,” Chera said. “So we know that the paper burden is one area that our members have raised a concern.”

Red Tape Awareness Week
 The United States border crossing is shown Wednesday, December 7, 2011 in Lacolle, Que., south of Montreal.
The United States border crossing is shown Wednesday, December 7, 2011 in Lacolle, Que., south of Montreal. © PC/Ryan Remiorz

The report, released on the first day of the so-called Red Tape Awareness Week, which was launched by the CFIB seven years ago, looked at the performance of both the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) and the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Agency in facilitating cross-border trade, Chera said.

Compared to the findings of the previous 2010 report, CBSA staff showed some improvement when it comes to the knowledge that is dispensed by border officials to small businesses and how they treat customers.

“We have certainly seen some improvement in businesses that have reported a better experience at the border,” Chera said. “But while there has been some improvement, the vast majority of businesses would not grade their experience as good, they would grade it as acceptable.”

The federation’s message to government is there is still a long way to go in making it easier for small businesses to trade, Chera said.

In fact, small business owners gave the CBSA website a worse rating for user friendliness than in 2010, likely stemming from the fact that a website developed by the agency for small businesses has been taken down, Chera said.

In comparison, CBSA fared somewhat better than its US counterpart. In particular, the CBP performed worse on the amount of paperwork and customer service than the CBSA, while it also registered higher dissatisfaction on website user friendliness than in 2010, according to the report.

The CBSA is committed to working with the CFIB in advancing key areas of benefit to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in support of trade facilitation, said a written statement by CBSA spokesperson Line Guibert-Wolff.

“A web page dedicated to SMEs on the CBSA website was removed as part of Web Renewal, a whole of Government initiative that aims to bring together all Government of Canada content to a single Web site:,” Guibert-Wolff wrote. “As the CBSA processes are the same regardless of the size of a company, the content of the SME page was updated and integrated into the Import and Export menus of the CBSA website.”

Categories: Economy, Politics
Tags: , , , , ,

Do you want to report an error or a typo? Click here!

@*@ Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available

Note: By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that Radio Canada International has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Radio Canada International does not endorse any of the views posted. Your comments will be pre-moderated and published if they meet netiquette guidelines.

Netiquette »

When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don’t always think alike—and that’s precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it’s important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1.’s online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3.’s online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in five languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  10. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  11. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International  is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  12. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  13. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International  forums is prohibited.
  14. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  15. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  16. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  17. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  18. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.