A group of interned Japanese Canadian men pose at a road camp in western Canada in March of 1942.

A group of interned Japanese Canadian men pose at a road camp in western Canada in March of 1942.
Photo Credit: Library and Archives Canada

More on forced sale of Japanese Canadians’ assets

Share

When Canada declared war on Japan in World War II, the Canadian government not only took Canadians of Japanese origin away from the homes, it also sold their houses and other property without their permission. New research suggests the western city of Vancouver had a long-term plan to redevelop the area when many Japanese Canadians lived. It took advantage of their evacuation to internment camps to condemn their homes and to urge the federal government to sell them.

The city of Vancouver inspected and condemned many of the homes of Japanese Canadians.
The city of Vancouver inspected and condemned many of the homes of Japanese Canadians. © Jack Lindsay/City of Vancouver Archives

‘Racism and antipathy towards Japanese Canadians’

There was also a desire on the part of some members of Parliament to give their houses to soldiers returning from the war. “Running through both of those arguments…were very strong expressions of racism and antipathy towards Japanese Canadians who had been part of British Columbia life for almost a century,” says Jordan Stanger-Ross, project director of Landscapes of Injustice, a project dedicated to the issue of this forced sale.

Listen

Canadian government reneged on promise

Many ethnic Japanese were living near the Pacific Coast in the province of British Columbia. About 75 per cent were Canadian citizens by birth or through naturalization. In February and March of 1942, they were rounded up and taken from their homes. In most cases, their homes were rented out, but the owners were assured their property would be returned to them after the war. Many hid valuables and treasured items in walls and other parts of their properties.

Not even one year later, on January 19, 1943, the federal government reversed itself and sold homes, fishing boats, businesses, farms, vehicles, clothing—everything the internees had not carried away with them. Hundreds wrote letters of complaint.

Vivian Rygenstad told CBC that her parents were among the 22,000 Japanese Canadians interned during World War II.
Vivian Rygenstad told CBC that her parents were among the 22,000 Japanese Canadians interned during World War II. © CBC

Public inquiry deem purposefully inadequate

There was eventually a public inquiry into the matter which Stanger-Ross said was limited and inadequate to compensate owners for their losses. “That was a deliberate position of the federal government—that they wanted to limit through this inquiry the extent of payments that would need to be made.”

‘A staggering amount…lost’

There have been apologies from governments, and in the 1970s and 1980s, some internees were compensated a sum of $20,000 each for general grievances, but not specifically for lost property. “In the lower mainland of British Columbia, where many Japanese Canadians were living, the rise in property values in the post-war period has been staggering,” says Stanger-Ross. “So to calculate the values of the properties that were lost, farms that were subdivided into dozens of lots…would be a staggering amount that Japanese Canadians have lost.”

A lesson for Canadians, says advocate

The treatment of Japanese Canadians during the war was said to be necessary to protect national security. But Sanger-Ross says the threat was over when their property was sold. People were in internment camps and their homes, warehouses and other property posed no threat.

This provides a valuable lesson for Canadians in the current context, he says. “I think that upholding civil and human rights in the context of perceived national insecurity may be one of the challenges our country faces–one of the big challenges for multiculturalism in our society for the next century.”

Last year, Canada passed controversial, new security legislation to deal with the threat of radical Muslim terrorism. When Bill C-51was being debated, Opposition Leader Tom Mulcair compared some of its provisions to those which stripped the rights of Japanese Canadians during World War II.

Share
Categories: Politics, Society
Tags: , , ,

Do you want to report an error or a typo? Click here!

@*@ Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available

Note: By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that Radio Canada International has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Radio Canada International does not endorse any of the views posted. Your comments will be pre-moderated and published if they meet netiquette guidelines.

Netiquette »

When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don’t always think alike—and that’s precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it’s important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1. RCInet.ca’s online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. RCInet.ca reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3. RCInet.ca’s online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in five languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  10. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  11. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International  is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  12. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  13. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International  forums is prohibited.
  14. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  15. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  16. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  17. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  18. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

*

One comment on “More on forced sale of Japanese Canadians’ assets
  1. Avatar Tristan tsuji says:

    I’ve always felt that the redress did not do enough to ensure the legacy for the next generations of JC people. I myself live in absolute poverty, meanwhile knowing that my family owned real estate in Vancouver that currently holds high value, it seems unfair that in the instance where racism was allowed to strip an entire people quite literally of everything they owned, that a token sum was deemed fair.
    I’ll likely die in poverty, and die knowing this country laid the groundwork for my position at birth.