The joint service seal of the unified Canadian Forces

Canada history, Feb 1, 1968; the unwelcome remaking of Canada’s military

There had been talk of this for years, even as far back as shortly after the Second World War; the merging of the three main military arms Canadian Army, Royal Canadian Navy and Royal Canadian Air Force, into one structure.

Following the most careful and thoughtful consideration, the government has decided that there is only one adequate solution. It is the integration of the Armed Forces of Canada under a single Chief of the Defence Staff. This will be the first step toward a single unified defence force for Canada” White Paper on Defence, March 1964

On this  date, February 1st, 1968  Bill C-243 came into effect. It did away with traditional distinguishing uniforms, rank structure, and the separate legal entities such that all would be known simply as the Canadian Armed Forces (or colloquially as the Canadian Forces)

In the 1950’s the then Minister of Defence Brooke Claxton began the process by creating a Chairman of the Chiefs of Defence Staff, and also ran all three services under a single ministry.  The Royal Military College (RMC) became a tri-service institution, and padres, legal, and health services also operated as tri-service. Later, Defence Minister George Pearkes would follow by doing the same for postal and food procurement.

But it was Defence Minister Paul Hellyer who pushed through the complete integration.

Left to Right, Prime Minister Lester B. Pearson, Minister of National Defence Paul Hellyer, and Air Chief Marshal Frank Miller, June 1965
Left to Right, Prime Minister Lester B. Pearson, Minister of National Defence Paul Hellyer, and Air Chief Marshal Frank Miller, June 1965 © Library and Archives Canada/Duncan Cameron/PA-117109

He had been in the RCAF during the Second World War, but had remustered to the Army in 1944 during the conscription crisis. He then had to undergo basic training all over again. That frustrating duplication remained with him when he entered politics and later became Minister of Defence.

The first big step came in 1964 with an amendment to the Defence Act which eliminated the three service heads to be replaced by a single Chief of Defence Staff (CDS) and reduced 11 command structures to six by June 1965.

  • Maritime Command
  • Mobile Command
  • Air Defence Command
  • Air Transport Command
  • Materiel Command
  • Training Command

However, the 1967 Bill C-243 represented the major change of full integration. The idea being to reduce duplication of services and the associated costs, and to streamline operations and create greater efficiency.  There has always been debate however about how much savings was, and has been, created.

*When everyone wore green*. Gone were Navy blue (almost black), air force sky blue, and army olive uniforms of the separate services to be, replaced by a new rifle green uniform.-never really loved by members. © RCA

The move was met with great resistance and the government was accused of not understanding or respecting the particular heritage and traditions of the separate entities. There were other less pleasant allegations associated with the fact the term “Royal” would be eliminated.  This was especially so with the Navy which more than the other two services had kept closer traditions to the British Royal Navy, and had fewer Francophones in its ranks.

Nevertheless, several senior officers in each of the services resigned in protest and frustration.

The move has reverberated throughout the years as cutbacks, and this seeming lack of identity with a particular service, did little to inspire new recruits to join.

Even though all were wearing the same “green” uniform and rank structures, members still tended stubbornly to identify with their units and particular branches of service. Fighting amongst the services over ever smaller budgets also kept the idea of separate entities alive if not openly, certainly not deeply hidden.
By the mid 1980’s the tide was being slowly turned back as members were permitted a return to distinctive colours to their uniforms. Also the term “Canadian Army” has since been re-instated, and in 2012 the “Royal” was returned to the navy and air force.  Thus the never popular Maritime Command, Air Command, and Land Command are now once again the Canadian Army, Royal Canadian Navy, and the Royal Canadian Air Force.

While still generally referred to as the Canadian Armed Forces, and bases are referred to merely as “Canadian Forces Base-(CFB) such and such, the pride in the individual service arms remained strong throughout the years, continues to be strong, and has to some extent resisted one of the greatest shakeups of Canada’s military and indeed of any military.

Additional information – sources

Categories: Politics, Society
Tags: , , , , , , ,

Do you want to report an error or a typo? Click here!

@*@ Comments

Leave a Reply

Note: By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that Radio Canada International has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Radio Canada International does not endorse any of the views posted. Your comments will be pre-moderated and published if they meet Netiquette guidelines.

When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don’t always think alike—and that’s precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it’s important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1.’s online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3.’s online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in five languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish or in one of the two official languages, English or French. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  10. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  11. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International  is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  12. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  13. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International  forums is prohibited.
  14. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  15. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  16. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  17. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  18. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


6 comments on “Canada history, Feb 1, 1968; the unwelcome remaking of Canada’s military
  1. Avatar Ronald Haskell says:

    I don’t know of any place that is still referred to as CFB – it’s 17 Wing or Edmonton Garrison or Esquimalt Dock yard. I’m not even sure new members would even know what CFB stands for.

    • Avatar Jake Dole says:

      We still refer to them as CFB Winnipeg, CFB Edmonton and CFB Esquimalt respectively. Each base lodges multiple commands and elements so to say that the Army’s 2 Brigade is part of the Air Force’s 17 Wing is inaccurate.

  2. Avatar Reg Scotland says:

    Canadian Forces is a misnomer. Canadian ARMED Forces was the proper name.