Barbara Kulaszka, seen here in 1990 at Imre Finta’s trial,. She acted as co-counsel for Finta, who was found not guilty of war crimes during WWII. Kulaszka died in June

Barbara Kulaszka, seen here in 1990 at Imre Finta’s trial,. She acted as co-counsel for Finta, who was found not guilty of war crimes during WWII. Kulaszka died in June
Photo Credit: CBC

Outrage over memorial having far right, racist overtones


Barbara Kulaszka died last month at age 64 in Brighton, Ontario, a town located about halfway between Toronto and Kingston.

A librarian turned lawyer, her death passed virtually unnoticed by most and was only publicized on Tuesday of this week.

A memorial planned for her Wednesday evening at a Toronto area public library however has caused an enormous controversy over the issue of free speech.

As a lawyer Kulaska successfully defended a variety of high profile holocaust deniers and white supremacists.

It was one of these groups that booked the library for the memorial, and which was loudly decried by anti-racist groups. They sought to stop the event at which the head of a well-known neo-nazi group, a holocaust denier, and a white supremacist were scheduled to speak.

Even Toronto Mayor John Tory  got involved asking the library to cancel the event, and to review its room rental policies.

Another Toronto city councillor called on the library to cancel the event.  In a statement cited by CTV News he wrote, “It is truly shocking that individuals who spread hatred, deny the Holocaust and have ties to neo-Nazi groups are being provided a permit by the Toronto Public Library to host an event inside a public building”.

In an email to RCI, the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms wrote.

“Barbara Kulaszka’s clients have said and written things that are understandably perceived as hateful by some.  That is not a valid basis for restricting unpopular views.  Those who call for the censorship of others’ opinions as “hateful” should recognize that their own speech may also be perceived as “hateful” by other people.  Yet they would not want their own speech censored. Hate is an entirely subjective emotion”.

The large Richview Public Library rents out space for community groups. They say they are reviewing policy after the controversial gathering yesterday evening.
The large Richview Public Library rents out space, as do others in the system, for community groups. The library system says they are reviewing policy after the controversial gathering yesterday evening. © Toronto Public Library

For its part the library manager Ana-Maria Pritchett , quoted by CityNews, responded to the controversy saying they were originally unaware of the group who booked the space and its racist ties, but added, “There’s nothing illegal that has taken place, certainly there are unpopular points of view that are very uncomfortable. People are able to come here and use the space as long as they abide by the law”.

The library said it had also received legal advice that it should not cancel the booking.

A statement released on its website read in part:

We have taken the concerns that have been raised very seriously, and have carefully assessed this situation from a legal, library and public perspective. We do not tolerate hate speech. However, we cannot deny bookings from the community that are in accordance with the law and the library’s policy and rules of conduct. To deny access to library spaces on the basis of the views or opinions that individuals or groups have expressed in the past contravenes the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the principles of intellectual freedom, both cornerstones of the library’s mission and values. We also respect the right to object and voice concerns.

This evening’s memorial event is an external third-party room booking and is not endorsed or sponsored by the Library, and is not in violation of the law.

Due to the controversy prior to yesterday evening’s event, there was a noticeable police presence around the building, and extra security inside, but only a small group attended, and no protests occurred.

Paul Fromm, himself a highly controversial figure, was one of the speakers at the event. He is a spokesman for a group called Council of Conservative Citizens of Canada (C4) a white supremacist group describing itself as wanting to preserve North America for the European founding people and which is “strongly opposed to massive Third World immigration.”

The organizer of Wednesday night’s memorial, Paul Fromm, says he and all attendees are taxpayers of the city of Toronto, and that they paid for the library
The organiser of Wednesday night’s memorial, Paul Fromm, says he and all attendees are taxpayers of the city of Toronto, and that they paid for the library. © Betsy Trumpener/CBC

Quoted in the CBC he said of the controversy that it has been “stirred up by the enemies of free speech” and that it’s ironic that Kulaszka’s memorial has become “a free speech battle for this brave lady who was a female pioneer in the free speech battle”.

The library says although nothing took place at the meeting that contravened its rules,  it will be reviewing its booking policy.

Sources- additional information

Tagged with: , , , , , , , ,
Posted in Politics, Society

Do you want to report an error or a typo? Click here!

@*@ Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available

Note: By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that Radio Canada International has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Radio Canada International does not endorse any of the views posted. Your comments will be pre-moderated and published if they meet netiquette guidelines.

Netiquette »

When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don’t always think alike—and that’s precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it’s important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1.’s online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3.’s online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in five languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  10. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  11. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International  is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  12. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  13. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International  forums is prohibited.
  14. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  15. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  16. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  17. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  18. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.


4 comments on “Outrage over memorial having far right, racist overtones
  1. Avatar Philip Mayer says:

    Good for the Toronto Public Library for standing up to the bullying cultural Marxists and protecting the right of free speech for all Canadian tax payers including those brave Canadians that are intellectual enough not to be victims of the totalitarian lies of fascist hypocrites.

  2. Avatar james ginn says:

    Her book on the Zundel trial was excellent. And there was nothing in the Harwood book which denied the Holocaust.

  3. Avatar Joe Stalin XXV says:

    Free Publicity for CAFE – Priceless !

    • Avatar Mary Newmark says:

      This has nothing to do with CAFE but if it did I wouldn’t be surprised since CAFE are defenders of human rights such as free speech.