U.S. President Donald Trump announces his strategy for the war in Afghanistan during an address from Fort Myer, Virginia, U.S., August 21, 2017.

U.S. President Donald Trump announces his strategy for the war in Afghanistan during an address from Fort Myer, Virginia, U.S., August 21, 2017.
Photo Credit: Joshua Roberts

Despite expected U.S. troop hike, no victory in sight in Afghan war: expert

Share

While U.S. President Donald Trump opened the door on Monday to beefing up U.S. forces in Afghanistan, the best he can hope for is “no victory, no defeat” in America’s longest war, says a Canadian expert.

Speaking before a crowd of hundreds of service members at Fort Myer in Virginia on Monday, Trump unveiled his new strategy to deal with the Afghan impasse.

Trump said the strategy is built on three precepts and encompasses Afghanistan, Pakistan, India, the Central Asian nations, extending into Southeast Asia. It will also not have artificial timelines built into it.

The U.S. must seek “an honorable and enduring outcome” worthy of the tremendous sacrifices in blood and treasure that have been made in the war has claimed the lives of more than 2,400 U.S. service members and is estimated to have cost more than $700 billion US since 2001, Trump said.

The second precept is that a hasty exit from Afghanistan would create a dangerous vacuum in Afghanistan, allowing terrorists to flood back into that country and begin planning attacks on America and its allies and partners, Trump said.

The third precept is the necessity to confront the instability and threats emanating from the region, he said.

Short on specifics
U.S. Army soldiers from the 2nd Platoon, B battery 2-8 field artillery, fire a howitzer artillery piece at Seprwan Ghar forward fire base in Panjwai district, Kandahar province southern Afghanistan, June 12, 2011.
U.S. Army soldiers from the 2nd Platoon, B battery 2-8 field artillery, fire a howitzer artillery piece at Seprwan Ghar forward fire base in Panjwai district, Kandahar province southern Afghanistan, June 12, 2011. © Baz Ratner

However, for all its grand statements Trump’s 30-minute speech was remarkably short on specifics on how these goals would be achieved, said Stephen Saideman, Paterson chair in international affairs at Carleton University and the author of Adapting in the Dust: Lessons Learned from Canada’s War in Afghanistan.

“The basic goal of sending 5,000 more troops or 4,000 more troops is to prevent the Afghan forces from collapsing, not to actually get to victory,” Saideman said.

(click to listen to the interview with Stephen Saideman)

Listen
Creating stalemate

According to several estimates the Afghan government, plagued by corruption, ethnic and political rivalries, controls less than 60 percent of the country.

The Afghan National Army and the national police are facing a very dangerous situation, Saideman said.

“They’ve been paying a very high price for their war, they’ve faced record casualties over the last year,” Saideman said. “The idea is for the American troops to provide them with some assistance and some training so they essentially can stay in the fight.”

The goal of the Trump administration’s new strategy is to help Afghan security forces reverse Taliban advances and create a military stalemate, hoping that it would eventually compel rebel leaders to agree to a political solution of the conflict.

An Afghan National Army (ANA) soldier keeps watch at a checkpoint in Kabul, Afghanistan, August 22, 2017.
An Afghan National Army (ANA) soldier keeps watch at a checkpoint in Kabul, Afghanistan, August 22, 2017. © Omar Sobhani

However, the Trump administration might have trouble convincing allies to join in the war effort.

Trouble with allies

According to NATO statistics, as of May 2017 there were about 13,500 troops from 39 contributing nations serving in the NATO-led Resolute Support Mission in Afghanistan. The U.S., has about 8,400 soldiers in Afghanistan.

The Liberal government of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has already given a clear signal that Canada, which lost 158 Canadian soldiers in Afghanistan, is not interested in going back because it’s already preoccupied with fighting ISIS in Iraq, and fielding a NATO force in Latvia, Saideman said.

“Trudeau has already said no and I don’t think he’ll be the only one because for most of the Europeans to get seriously involved in this requires votes in parliament,” Saideman said. “And given that Trump is toxic in Europe, he’s widely reviled, very few politicians are willing to be seen as helping Trump out.”

The U.S.-led coalition in Afghanistan was unable to defeat the Taliban and other insurgent groups when it had a combined force of over 100,000 troops on the ground in 2010.

Adding a few thousand American and allied soldiers is not likely to drastically change the situation in the country, Saideman said.

“This is just ‘kick the can down the road’ and keep the war going on but it’s not going to lead to better or more effective Afghan government,” Saideman said. “But this will also probably help the Afghans stay in the fight a little longer.”

Getting tough with Pakistan?

Trump also signalled a toughening of the U.S. policy vis-à-vis Pakistan, warning authorities in Islamabad that they must stop providing safe havens for terrorists and insurgents.

“We can no longer be silent about Pakistan’s safe havens for terrorist organisations, the Taliban, and other groups that pose a threat to the region and beyond,” Trump said. “Pakistan has much to gain from partnering with our effort in Afghanistan. It has much to lose by continuing to harbour terrorists.”

Saideman said confronting Pakistan is easier said than done.

Both the Bush and the Obama administrations had no choice but to rely on Pakistan because of its key geographic position as the main conduit for the resupply of U.S. and NATO troops in Afghanistan.

“It’s very hard to supply the troops without Pakistan’s support, so I don’t see this antagonizing of Pakistanis to be a long-term successful strategy,” Saideman said. “The only other way to get stuff to the country is to go through Iran or Russia, and that certainly is not going to happen.”

Share
Categories: International, Politics, Society
Tags: , , , ,

Do you want to report an error or a typo? Click here!

@*@ Comments

Leave a Reply

Note: By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that Radio Canada International has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Radio Canada International does not endorse any of the views posted. Your comments will be pre-moderated and published if they meet Netiquette guidelines.

Netiquette
When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don’t always think alike—and that’s precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it’s important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1. RCInet.ca’s online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. RCInet.ca reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3. RCInet.ca’s online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in five languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish or in one of the two official languages, English or French. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  10. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  11. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International  is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  12. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  13. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International  forums is prohibited.
  14. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  15. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  16. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  17. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  18. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*