View of the Chateau Laurier with its French castle-like architecture with the public park behind and heritage Rideau Canal beside. (Google)

Controversial addition approved for historic landmark hotel


The iconic Chateau Laurier hotel in Ottawa has been the centre of a heated debate about architecture.

The hotel, is located in the heart of the national capital and since it’s construction in 1912, has been a landmark and focal point located beside the Parliament buildings.

The owners want to build an addition to the hotel but a vast number of critics say the proposed addition clashes with the over 100-year-old French chateau “castle-like” style.

The latest to join the opposition was Canadian born Hollywood actor, director and comedian Tom Green.

Ottawa city council in a final, and last minute, vote yesterday have approved the addition. Many who voted in favour of the addition say their hands are tied because it is a privately owned operation and they have little say in the matter.

Critics say the hotel’s unique architecture, history, and location all make it a case for special consideration.

Ottawa architect Barry Padofsky, opposed to the design, created this image of what the final addition will look like and how it would block the view of the iconic hotel when viewed from the park behind- (compare to Tom Green video image)  (illustration-Barry Padolsky Associates Inc Architects)

A letter from Senator Serge Joyal, and famed Montreal architect Phyliss Lambert was sent to Heritage Minister Pablo Rodriquez asking for his intervention and expressing what many have felt about the proposed addition,

“We are deeply concerned that the integrity of the original architecture of the Château Laurier is being destroyed, and that you and the Commission have surrendered and washed your hands of the issue, as if this is happening in some remote backyard”.

The hotel is owned by Amin and Monsoor Lalji through Lalco investments. In light of the opposition, over time they have proposed several alterations to the addition and reduced its height from eleven stories to seven. They say they have met all legal requirements and apparently are not wanting to make further changes.

Proposed addition viewed from the west. Critics have compared the design to a “shipping container” or a “radiator” (Larco Investments).

Fight may still not be over.

Now a federal politician has weighed in. Catherine McKenna, the Member of Parliament for Ottawa Centre is asking for reconsideration by the owners. She is also the minister for Parks Canada, which overseas historic properties. She says she’s been contacted by many residents in the city and others across Canada about opposition to the proposed addition and is quoted saying, “”We are building for the next 100 years and I believe there is still time for common sense to prevail and for the community and the private sector owner to come together to achieve an outcome in which everyone can take pride”.

The National Capital Commission (NCC) overseas properties and parks in the capital area including Parliament and Major’s Hill Park directly behind the hotel and will have some say in any landscaping or shadows into the park related to the addition. Both McKenna and the NCC say they would like to work with the owners to come up with a design that would be more acceptable to a wide range of people.

Opponents, including a group called Friends of the Chateau, say they are looking at options which may include launching a legal challenge against the heritage permit allowing the addition.

Additional information-sources

Categories: Arts and Entertainment, Economy, Politics, Society
Tags: , , ,

Do you want to report an error or a typo? Click here!

@*@ Comments

Leave a Reply

Note: By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that Radio Canada International has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Radio Canada International does not endorse any of the views posted. Your comments will be pre-moderated and published if they meet netiquette guidelines.

Netiquette »

When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don’t always think alike—and that’s precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it’s important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1.’s online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3.’s online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in five languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish or in one of the two official languages, English or French. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  10. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  11. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International  is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  12. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  13. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International  forums is prohibited.
  14. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  15. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  16. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  17. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  18. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available


One comment on “Controversial addition approved for historic landmark hotel
  1. Avatar Peter Ashcroft says:

    It is a true challenge extending Chateau Latour in the original style so that it blends in with Quebec City.
    Any 21st. century update would be detrimental to both The Chateau and the Quebec City skyline.