The Canada Revenue Agency headquarters in Ottawa. It is directing audits on at least 52 Canadian charities. The photo shows a beautiful fall day with leaves still on a giant maple that rises at the right of picture. On the left is the headquarters, a Victorian grey and tan brick building with a tower reaching up to a crisp azure sky. At the bottom of the picture in the foreground is a sign identifying the building. We "Canada Revenue Agency" printed at the top of the sign in black letters on a white base. To the left of that part of the sign is a logo of the Canadian flag in white and red. On the main body of the sign National Headquarters written in white on a black background.

The Canada Revenue Agency headquarters in Ottawa. It is directing audits on at least 52 Canadian charities.
Photo Credit: Canadian Press / Sean Kilpatrick

Revenue Canada charity audits continue to stir the political pot


Finally speaking to the simmering controversy over its political-activities audits, the Canadian Revenue Agency says it is going by the book.

Long-standing debate on the matter flared up again last week after two charities, PEN Canada, a member of the world-wide free-speech advocate, PEN International, and Karios, which works mainly overseas and is administered by the United Church of Canada, publicly said they were being audited by CRA.

Kerry-Lynne Findlay is sworn in as the Minister of National Revenue during a Cabinet shuffle at Rideau Hall in Ottawa on July 15, 2013. Her department says there a wave of audits on Canadian charities are not politically driven. She is seen from the front, facing a man wearing a dark suit who is administering the oath. We see only his back. She is wearing a dark blue suit. Her hair is blond and shoulder length. In front of her--to her right--in a thin microphone. In the background we get hazy views of those in attendance. The only thing standing out in the background is blue turban sitting atop of face we cannot distinguish.
Kerry-Lynne Findlay is sworn in as the Minister of National Revenue during a Cabinet shuffle at Rideau Hall in Ottawa on July 15, 2013. Her department says there a wave of audits on Canadian charities are not politically driven. © Canadian Press/Adrian Wyld

They were just the latest Canadian charities to divulge they were being audited.

The full list has not been made public, but the ones that are known have had differences over policy with Stephen Harper’s Conservative government in the past.

Besides PEN Canada and Kairos, the list includes Amnesty International Canada, the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, Canada Without Poverty and the David Suzuki Foundation.

Critics say the charities are being vindictively targeted because of the policy disagreements. Conservative Party supports disagree.

Based on a government policy initiated in 2003 by the then-governing Liberal Party, charities are permitted to spend up to 10 per cent of their resources on political activities and are not allowed to endorse a party or a candidate.

The sticking point is what constitutes a political activity. .

In its 2012 budget, the Conservatives gave the Canadian Revenue Agency $8 million to carry out  political-activities audits. Since then, at least 52  have been launched.

In an interview with the Globe and Mail published Saturday, the director-general of the Canadian Revenue Agency’s charities directorate, Cathy Hawara, said the audits are designed to be balanced across the political spectrum.

Ms. Hawara said neither the Prime Minister’s Office nor Revenue Minister Kerry-Lynne Findlay’s office had any say in the audit list.

“We are not targeting charities that have particular political leanings,” Ms. Hawara told the Globe. She added that the charities being audited were established by screening CRA files.

In some cases, she said, the agency sent  “reminder letters” to charities cautioning them about a particular activity and said the CRA also sent notes asking organizations about what the agency thought might be errors in documents such as annual reports.

Environmentalist David Suzuki, whose charity is being audited by the Canada Revenue Agency, is shown in January during a press conference for the
Environmentalist David Suzuki, whose charity is being audited by the Canada Revenue Agency, is shown in January during a press conference for the “Honour the Treaties” tour, a series benefit concerts being held to raise money for legal fight against the expansion of the Athabasca oilsands in northern Alberta and other similar projects. © Canadian Press/Mark Blinch

Mr. Hawara told the Globe the audits of 12 of 52 charities are now closed. She said five of the 12 were concluded with a written document called a compliance agreement. It spells out the steps a charity must take to comply with the rules.

The Globe reported that three charities received “education letters” in which they were asked to fix “minor non-compliance” issues.

Gareth Kirkby is a former journalist who researched this topic as part of a master’s thesis for Royal Roads University in Victoria, British Columbia. He was included in the Globe article, expressing doubt the audits are balanced in terms of political leanings.

Mr. Kirkby said his research led him to conclude three specific charitable sectors are being singled out: environmental groups, development and human rights charities, and charities receiving donations from labour groups.

Mr. Kirkby, who now works in the communications field, spoke by phone to RCI from his home in Vancouver.

Categories: Economy, Environment, International, Internet, Science and Technology, Politics, Society

Do you want to report an error or a typo? Click here!

@*@ Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available

Note: By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that Radio Canada International has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Radio Canada International does not endorse any of the views posted. Your comments will be pre-moderated and published if they meet netiquette guidelines.

Netiquette »

When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don’t always think alike—and that’s precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it’s important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1.’s online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3.’s online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in five languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  10. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  11. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International  is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  12. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  13. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International  forums is prohibited.
  14. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  15. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  16. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  17. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  18. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.