Stumps and branches of trees that were recently cut down by workers hired by Kinder Morgan are seen in the Burnaby Mountain Conservation Area, in Burnaby, B.C., on Sept. 10, 2014.
Photo Credit: Darryl Dyck/Canadian Press

Pipeline dispute: grimacing is assault?

Does a furrowed brow and frown constitute assault?

null
Posting photos of themselves grimacing on Twitter, hundreds of people have heaped scorn on the energy company for it’s lawyers contention that grimacing constitutes assault. © K Nagata-twitter

Well that’s what a subsidiary of energy giant Kinder-Morgan is alleging.  The company, Trans Mountain, is doing exploratory survey work for a pipeline expansion project near Vancouver.

Protestors have been staging demonstrations against the pipeline survey which could potentially pass through a conservation area on Burnaby Mountain.

“There may be an environmental objective that motivates the people generally,”said Bill Kaplan, lawyer for the oil company. Speaking to Associate Chief Justice Austin Cullen on Wednesday, he added, “But the actual specific dominant purpose here … is to harm Kinder Morgan by preventing Trans Mountain (from doing) its work.

The company was in court on Wednesday seeking an injunction against protestors at its exploration sites, ahead of another legal action where it is suing five people for close to $6-million for their part in opposing the pipeline and terminal expansion.

Two of the five are university professors.  Lynne Quarmby chairs Simon Fraser University’s microbiology department.  Outside the courtroom told the placard-waving crowd outside the court that she believed she was “targeted” in the suit because she had spoken out against climate change.

“I think that is why they are trying to silence me”, she said.

Trans-Mountain is seeking an injunction after two incidents in October, including shouting in a megaphone near a worker’s ear, others chanting “Go back to Texas”  and a protester chaining himself under a survey crew vehicle.

Trans-mountain lawyer Bill Kaplan, told the British Columbia Supreme Court the protesters efforts to stop the company from it’s lawful activities should be considered “a conspiracy to harm”

Facial expressions: malicious, violent, constitute assault

null
Protesters calling themselves The Caretakers have set up camp in Burnaby Mountain conservation area in B.C., in opposition to Kinder Morgan plans to bore through the municipal park to expand its Trans Mountain pipeline. © CBC

He says that erecting protest signs near the site on the mountain does constitute free expression, but then he presented photographs of the protesters with facial expressions he said were malicious.

He then went on to hint that those facial expressions constitute violence

“One of the things I will argue is that is not only intimidation, but that is actually an assault,” he said. “Some of the faces demonstrate the anger, and frankly, the violence demonstrated by some of the people.”

twitter: #KMface

The comment resulted in a flurry of scornful ripostes on social media with people taking photos of themselves grimacing,  spreading the derision using “ #KMface “.

The city of Burnaby, and Kinder-Morgan have been confronting each other over the $5.4 billion dollar pipeline expansion, filing legal action and applications to the National Energy Board (NEB).

The NEB however has ruled that Burnaby can’t stop the company’s activities. It says it needs the information from geotechnical analysis in order to make recommendations to the federal government about whether the project should proceed.

Categories: Economy, Environment & Animal Life, International, Politics, Society
Tags: , ,

Do you want to report an error or a typo? Click here!

For reasons beyond our control, and for an undetermined period of time, our comment section is now closed. However, our social networks remain open to your contributions.