Blacktip shark off the coast of South Africa

Blacktip shark off the coast of South Africa, A report from Simon Fraser University says the decline in shark and ray catches worldwide is not due to better regulations
Photo Credit: N Dulvy Simon Fraser University

Shark,ray study shows overfishing is depleting stocks


Reported catching of sharks , rays and related species have declined by as much as 20 percent since peak shark landings in 2003.

Researchers at Simon Fraser University in British Columbia, wanted to examine the hypothesis that the reduction was due to better management practices, than species decline.

Lindsay Davidson is a PhD candidate  in marine biodiversity and conservation, and lead author of the study.

Lindsay Davidson, PhD candidate in in marine biodiversity and conservation at Simon Fraser University, British Columbia
Lindsay Davidson, PhD candidate in in marine biodiversity and conservation at Simon Fraser University, British Columbia, lead author of the study © supplied

The study entitled, “Why have global shark and ray landings declined: improved management or overfishing” is published in Fish and Fisheries.

Davidson says that in 2010 a report was released stating that the hope was that the decline in shark and ray catches was due to better fishing regulations.

She notes however that the decline of 20% would have been much steeper but for a steep increase in Blue Shark landings, mostly by Spain.  She suggests however that the increase in this one species may be due to fishers having to travel further offshore into deeper waters where Blue sharks are as the coastal sharks are depleted.  Hunted not only for “fin soup”, sharks and rays are sought for meat, gill plates, liver oil, and leather.

Davidson admits that due to lax regulation, or simply unenforced regulations, and illegal fishing, the “official” numbers they could use in their research were possibly two to three times below the actual numbers of sharks, rays, and related species being caught.  Thus the landings peak in 2003, said to be 900,000 tonnes, may probably be closer to to 2-million tonnes.

A worker collects pieces of shark fins dried on the rooftop of a factory building in Hong Kong in 2013 .
A worker collects pieces of shark fins dried on the rooftop of a factory building in Hong Kong in 2013 . © Kin Cheung/Associated Press

Their research notes that new regulations did not explain the decrease which was more likely related to overfishing.

Their study revealed a correlation to the size of coastal human populations and shark and ray depletion, and where countries had a substantial meat export industry.

Example of illegal shark fishing in August 2011, Hundreds of sharks were seized from a Taiwanese fishing vessel in Palau
Example of illegal shark fishing in August 2011, Hundreds of sharks were seized from a Taiwanese fishing vessel in Palau © Associated Press/Micronesian Shark Foundation

She hopes that countries will see this report as a call to impose or add strength to existing fishing regulations to develop a sustainable fishery as has been case in countries like Canada, the US and Australia.

As written in the study, “Increased implementation of legally binding operational fisheries management and species-specific reporting is urgently required to avoid declines and ensure fisheries sustainability and food security.”

Categories: Economy, Environment, International, Internet, Science and Technology, Society
Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Do you want to report an error or a typo? Click here!

@*@ Comments

Leave a Reply

Note: By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that Radio Canada International has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Radio Canada International does not endorse any of the views posted. Your comments will be pre-moderated and published if they meet Netiquette guidelines.

When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don’t always think alike—and that’s precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it’s important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1.’s online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3.’s online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in five languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish or in one of the two official languages, English or French. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  10. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  11. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International  is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  12. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  13. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International  forums is prohibited.
  14. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  15. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  16. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  17. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  18. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *