Canada’s Bill C-23 would give even more power to U.S. border guards now operating in Canada at airports, and other travel terminals USA, bus rail, ferry

Canada’s Bill C-23 would give even more power to U.S. border guards now operating in Canada at airports, and other travel terminals with destinations into the US
Photo Credit: CBC

Canadians growing uneasy about more power for U.S. border guards in Canada


Although not stated, the idea came from terrorist attacks in the U.S. resulting in much tighter border controls in the US.

An  international agreement with the US in 2015 permitted U.S. border agents to operate on Canadian soil, in airports, rail, bus and other terminals. This was to create “pre-clearance” to reduce delays at US entry points.

Now a new federal proposal, Bill C-23 would give U.S. agents on Canadian soil, even more powers, including the power to detain Canadians, conduct strip searches of Canadian travellers, and to carry sidearms.

A survey released today by the polling firm Angus Reid Institute shows Canadians are becoming more uneasy about giving American authorities more powers on Canadian soil.

C-23 would give U.S agents the right to carry sidearms in Canada, and to detain and strip search Canadians. Civil rights advocacy groups have expressed strong conceerns about the law. © CBC

The survey shows about half (49%) of respondents agree with the bill, while over a third (36%) oppose it, and 15 percent are unsure.

A clear majority of travellers who have gone through the process say the pre-clearance was generally easy (93%) and indeed 55 percent would like it expanded.

However, things change slightly with a different question. When  asked if C-23 gives too much power to  U.S. border guards on Canadian soil, 53 percent of respondents said it does.  Some 48 percent says C-23 strikes the right balance overall.

Civil rights advocacy groups, and the federal political opposition parties have expressed their concerns over the Bill since its proposal and the issue of giving foreign authorities such powers within Canada..

Sources-additional information

Categories: Immigration & Refugees, International, Politics, Society
Tags: , , , , , ,

Do you want to report an error or a typo? Click here!

@*@ Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available

Note: By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that Radio Canada International has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Radio Canada International does not endorse any of the views posted. Your comments will be pre-moderated and published if they meet netiquette guidelines.

Netiquette »

When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don’t always think alike—and that’s precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it’s important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1.’s online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3.’s online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in five languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  10. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  11. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International  is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  12. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  13. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International  forums is prohibited.
  14. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  15. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  16. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  17. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  18. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.


5 comments on “Canadians growing uneasy about more power for U.S. border guards in Canada
  1. Avatar John McVicar says:

    Are we going to be allowed to have our people south of the border to do the same thing for visitors coming into Canada. I can’t see the Americans wanting Canadian law enforcement people on THEIR soil with guns.
    AND, I just don’t want Americans up here with guns. Their gun culture is so different than ours. Their police are trained differently than ours. Come up here without guns? Fine. They wouldn’t be doing their work in isolation anyway, so Canadians with guns could be close by.

  2. Avatar jim cowan says:

    Chuck em out.!But nicely.

  3. Avatar David Gerrior says:

    I think this would be a huge mistake. Does this also allow Canadian Border guards the same right to carry arms in the US or detain American citizens? I doubt American officials would allow such an intrusion by Canadian Border guards and they would scream bloody murder. This would be seen as an affront to American civil rights to be detained by foreign officials on US soil! Wake up Mr. Trudeau. Unless we are granted the same rights of search and seizure then see this for what it is – American intrusion justified by unlikely fears of terrorist attacks. I felt the 2015 international agreement permitting U.S. border agents to operate on Canadian soil was unjustified. The pretext of “pre-clearance” to reduce delays at US entry points was a red herring. I would have stopped at the allowing them to work in Canada but not to carry side arms or the ability to detain anyone. All they have to do is work with a legitimate Canadian peace officer who would carry side arms and have the right to detain someone. No government should give away its powers of search, detain or seizure. It makes no sense at all and as a Canadian citizen I would be outraged by an American who would try and detain me on Canadian soil!

  4. Avatar Rene Albert says:

    Does anyone else have the feeling that the Americans are getting a little paranoid???

    • Avatar David Gerrior says:

      Rene you are absolutely correct! Paranoia seems to be rampant in the US and its only going to grow worse under the current administration. The border is there for a reason. It defines our country and to allow any other country to operate on Canadian soil as if they were in the USA is patently ridiculous. Its time to pull the plug on this scheme.