Wednesday 18 April, 2018. The entrance to the Canadian High Commission in Trafalgar Square. London has been blocked by climate campaigners who’ve built a huge oil pipeline around the building. The protest comes as Canadian PM Justin Trudeau is set to meet Commonwealth Heads of Government. The pipeline is branded ‘Crudeau Oil’., a play on the words "crude oil" and Prime Minister Trudeau's namel The blockade is a protest against the Trudeau government’s plans to build a huge oil pipeline from the Alberta tar sands across indigenous lands to ports in British Columbia. PHOTO- Greenpeace UK

Canada’s pipeline battle follows Prime Minister to London


Canada is embroiled in an increasingly bitter battle over an oil pipeline. The Trans Mountain pipeline would see the American headquartered company, Kinder Morgan, build a pipeline from the Alberta oil-sands across the Rocky Mountains, through British Columbia to the coast where it would be loaded on tankers destined for Asia.

The battle has pitted environmentalists, some B.C city mayors, some aboriginal groups and the B.C government against Kinder Morgan, some aboriginal groups, the Alberta government and recently the federal government.

The model pipeline stretched across the front of the Canadian High Commission while officials and police stood by to ensure no incidents occurred. Photo- Greenpeace UK

Canada’s Prime Minister Trudeau who has recently vowed the pipeline will proceed saw the battle follow him to London today where activists erected a fake pipeline barrier around the Canadian High Commission where Trudeau was holding meetings.

The protesters climbed two of the large columns to unfurl banners  which mimicked signs on the model pipeline .

In addition to the pipeline, large banners were hung on two of the building’s columns along with a slightly larger than life cutout photo of the Prime Minister wearing a construction hat. Many Londoners seemed unaware of the pipeline debate raging furiously in Canada. Photo; Greenpeace UK

Trudeau was in the building but left quickly soon after. He will meet with the British PM and Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth before attending a Commonwealth leaders’ meeting on Thursday where he is expected to defend the environment.

Pat Venditti, head of Greenpeace UK said it was, “very hypocritical of the prime minister to be here in London talking about climate change while building a climate-wrecking pipeline that can only lead to more fossil fuels being burned”.

If completed, the new pipeline would greatly increase tanker traffic in the sensitive coastal area of British Columbia Photo- via Angus Reid

Meanwhile a new survey by the Angus Reid Institute shows an increasing majority (65%) of residents in B.C say the government should not block the pipeline.

When asked if a court rules that B.C does not have the constitutional authority to block the line, 69% of B.C residents say the provincial government should give in.

Even supporters of the pipeline expressed some concerns about the risks associated with its building and use Photo- Angus Reid Inst.

It has been suggested by both the Alberta and federal governments that public money might be used to invest in the pipeline to ensure its completion, but the majority of Canadians nationally (56%) think that’s a bad idea.

When asked about the risks, a clear majority (74%) said they feared an accident or spill from tankers, while other questions showed majority concern about other risks to the environment.

Categories: Economy, Environment, International, Politics, Society
Tags: , , , , ,

Do you want to report an error or a typo? Click here!

@*@ Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available

Note: By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that Radio Canada International has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Radio Canada International does not endorse any of the views posted. Your comments will be pre-moderated and published if they meet netiquette guidelines.

Netiquette »

When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don’t always think alike—and that’s precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it’s important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1.’s online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3.’s online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in five languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  10. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  11. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International  is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  12. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  13. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International  forums is prohibited.
  14. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  15. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  16. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  17. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  18. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.


2 comments on “Canada’s pipeline battle follows Prime Minister to London
  1. Avatar Peter Ashcroft says:

    Is this tar-sand oil detrimental to the climate wherever it is used?
    Are the Asian countries who are purchasing this oil, following up on climate change low carbon pollution policy?

  2. Avatar ursula wagner says:

    Pat Venditti, head of Greenpeace UK said it was, “very hypocritical of the prime minister to be here in London talking about climate change while building a climate-wrecking pipeline that can only lead to more fossil fuels being burned”.

    It simply makes you speechless, I thought Mr. Trudeau was voted for something very differently.

    Hasn`t the oil sands production destroyed enough of Canada?

    But that is what politics is for, always in the interest of big companies, never mind the damage to environment and people,
    and never mind what they tell us before elected, in Canada and everywhere.