Canada History: July 11, 1990, the crisis and death at Oka

Quebec provincial pollce officer killed during attack

It was a conflict –a land dispute-that had its origins as far back as the early 1700’s. It reached a boiling point and international headlines on this day, July 11, 1990.

That was when a Quebec provincial police tactical squad stormed an armed Mohawk barricade.

In March 1990, as tensions mount over a private development project planned in “the pines”, Mohawk of Khanestake drag an ice fishing hut onto a small road into the pines, saying it’s their land and development will not take place. (Ellen Gabriel)

A firefight ensued in which 31-year-old Constable Marcel Lemay was fatally wounded leading to a summer-long armed standoff between police and the Mohawk of Kanesatake, near the western Quebec village of Oka.

The “Oka Crisis” as it became known lasted throughout most of of 1990 and to this day remains mostly unresolved.

A telephoto shot showing the provincial police at the bottom of highway 344 with the Mohawk barricade at the top several hundred metres away, and made using abandoned police vehicles after the botched police raid July 11, 1990. (Ryan Remiorz-CP)

In the early 1700’s the French king granted a Catholic mission in “New France” a large parcel of land to be held in trust for the Mohawk in the region to the north west of Montreal   which the Mohawk called Kanestake.

The Church Mission instead quickly gave itself ownership of the land and began to sell parcels to settlers.

The story continues under British rule and peaceful protest letters by the Mohawk continue. These are mostly ignored.

Khanestake lies on the western edge of the village of Oka shown by red balloon. (Google maps)

In 1936 the Seminary sold off most of the remaining land to the nearby Quebec municipality of Oka.

In 1959 Oka then leases a section of land to a private golf course in a disputed area adjacent to “the Pines”, an area in which Mohawk a century earlier had planted hundreds of pine trees to stabilise the soft earth.

As the dispute simmers over the years and land claims issues remain ignored or dismissed, in 1970 a militant group forms in Khanestake called the Mohawk Warriors. Their goal is to repossess land they claim.

In 1989, with no consultation with the Mohawk, Oka gave permission for the golf course to expand further into the Pines and build luxury condominiums even into a Mohawk cemetery.

That decision then enflames an already tense situation with Mohawk  who then barricade access to the area even as the war of words escalates.

Violence erupts

The town called in the provincial police, the Surete de Quebec (SQ) telling them to remove the barricades-with force if necessary- while at the same time the Warriors vowing to defend their land to the death.  Both the provincial government and federal government have been calling for calm on all sides.

At this point other First Nations act in sympathy and begin to erect symbolic barricades on their lands in areas across the country. The issue gains national and international media attention.

Also in sympathy, a reserve just to the south of Montreal would soon occupy and block an important bridge causing extreme frustration for thousands of residents in Montreal and the south shore who used the Mercier Bridge daily.

With two Quebec injunctions ordering the Pines barricade be dismantled, the SQ decide they will act in spite of warnings by informers that a group of Mohawk are armed and that any intervention will both provoke a strong reaction from the militants and also increase support in the Mohawk community for the militant group.

In spite of this in the the early morning of July 11, without advising the provincial Premier or the Minister of Security, the SQ tactical squad launched an ill-planned raid to dismantle the barricades and disarm the Mohawk.

In the confusion shooting began with tear gas and  and as bullets whizzed by both sides, a police officer fell, mortally wounded

The botched raid left several SQ vehicles abandoned which were later used to build up the blockade on the highway through the area, Route 344.

CBC News Report. (plays after advert)

Lemay dies in hospital later. The crisis and blockade continues and on August 20 the provincial government asked the army to intervene after weeks of talks fail to resolve the issue.

The tense standoff continues with media from around the world following the story.

One of the most iconic photos of the months long standoff shows then 21-year-old steadfast Cpl Patrick Cloutier being taunted by Saskatchewan Ojibwa Brad Laroque, This came after the army was called in after the failed SQ raid. (Shaney Komulainen/Canadian Press

Fearing the large army presence, many of the Mohawk leave with only a relatively small group remaining.

On September 2 after further negotiations gain little ground, the army moves in dismantling the main barrier on Route 344.  As September continues, the army slowly pushed forward and physical confrontations ensue with several warriors, residents, and soldiers hurt.

As the army moves in during September, dozens of militant Mohawk get involved in a melee with soldiers, Many people on both sides suffered minor injuries and several Mohawk were detained. (Tom Hanon-CP)

In mid-Sept, army raids seize a number of Mohawk weapons.

On September 26 the militants decide to disengage and a very confused general surrender occurs.

By the end of the day, the crisis ends with the military in control. They will withdraw at the end of the month.

Two of the several Mohawk arrested will later be charged with  a variety of offences and sentenced to less than two years in jail. Charges against other Mohawk are withdrawn.

Lemay’s death unsolved, land claim remains unresolved

In spite of a number of conspiracy theories, a coroner later determined that Lemay had been shot by a bullet fired from the Mohawk positions, although the shooter was never determined.

In 2015 the new mayor of Oka and Grand Chief Serge Simon sign an agreement that no development will ever occur in the Pines that will threaten the peace.

The actual ownership of the land however remains unresolved.

Additional information-sources
Categories: Indigenous, Politics, Society
Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Do you want to report an error or a typo? Click here!

@*@ Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available

Note: By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that Radio Canada International has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Radio Canada International does not endorse any of the views posted. Your comments will be pre-moderated and published if they meet netiquette guidelines.

Netiquette »

When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don’t always think alike—and that’s precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it’s important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1.’s online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3.’s online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in five languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  10. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  11. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International  is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  12. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  13. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International  forums is prohibited.
  14. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  15. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  16. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  17. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  18. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.