Monika Schaefer from a Holocaust denial video (YouTube)

Update: Canadian couple convicted in Germany for hate


The German law is called “Volksverhetzung” which loosely translates as “incitement to hatred”.  In a trial which ended last Friday, a Canadian woman was convicted for her 2016 youtube video which claimed the Holocaust never happened and that it was a “six million lie”.

Her brother Alfred, aged 63, was also convicted under the same law.

Monika Schaefer, aged 59, of Jasper Alberta was visiting Germany  in January to attend the trial of another Holocaust denier, Sylvia Stolz who was later convicted of Holocaust denial.

She was arrested at the time and faced six charges. She was held in prison since then while the trial took place as both she and her brother were considered “flight risks” and could find shelter among sympathisers.

Convicted last week she was sentenced to 10 months in jail, but has been released owing to time already served.

Canadian-born Schaefer aged 59, had been a federal candidate for the Green Party in Alberta, running unsuccessfully three times starting in 2006 before she was rejected by the party when her views became known.

Alfred Schaefer at a Holocaust denial rally in June in Nuremburg making a comment about how high a dog can jump and using that as an excuse to give what could easily be interpreted as a Nazi salute to a receptive audience. (YouTube via B’nai Brith”

Her brother Alfred, a German-Canadian, who apparently labelled the trial as an “inquisition” had been arrested in connection with several denial videos and a speech at a rally in Dresden with a well-known Holocaust denier Gerhard Ittner.  He was filmed at another rally in June in Nuremburg. Facing 11 charges, Alfred Schaefer was found guilty and was handed a stiffer sentence of three years and two months.

Additional information-sources

CBC: W Snowdon: Oct 26/18: Monika Schaefer convicted

Canadian Press (via Huffington Post) Oct 27:18: ex-Green candidate convicted in Germany

B’nai Brith Canada: May 8/18: Alfred Schaeffer conviction

Sachische Zeitung: A Schneider: May 5/18: Alfred Schaefer convicted for Holocaust denial

B”nai Brith: Jul 5/18: Schaefer’s on trial

Categories: International, Politics, Society
Tags: , , , ,

Do you want to report an error or a typo? Click here!

@*@ Comments

Leave a Reply to Ursula Wagner Cancel reply

Note: By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that Radio Canada International has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Radio Canada International does not endorse any of the views posted. Your comments will be pre-moderated and published if they meet Netiquette guidelines.

When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don’t always think alike—and that’s precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it’s important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1.’s online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3.’s online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in five languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish or in one of the two official languages, English or French. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  10. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  11. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International  is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  12. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  13. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International  forums is prohibited.
  14. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  15. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  16. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  17. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  18. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


2 comments on “Update: Canadian couple convicted in Germany for hate
  1. Avatar Ursula Wagner says:

    I simply have to look for words to express my dismay about this comment.

    But what else can one expect from a German-born Australian right-wing extremist and holocaust denier as Dr. Fredrick Toben.

    Before I read this post I never heard of Zundel. By looking him up in the net I found this one.

    And it makes me simply speechless, that someone like Ernst Zundel was not stopped by Canadian authority in his activities.

    Hopefully these Nazi pest will be stopped one day!

  2. Avatar Dr Fredrick Toben says:

    The German law is, like the other equivalent Human Rights Laws, a watered-down defamation law but where truth is no defence.

    In fact there is no defence and a justification in court is considered by the judge proof of the defendant having “criminal energy”, thereby committing another criminal act in court.

    When a judgment is handed down, the lying media claims it is a “Holocaust denial” conviction, when in fact the shut-up and defamatory terms used against the accused are never legally defined during the proceedings – “hater”, “Holocaust denier”, “antisemite”, “racist”, “Nazi”, etc.

    Why is this not mentioned in your article that the Schaefer Siblings never had a chance of defending themselves against a law where guilt is pronounced on a normative feeling of hurt caused by what was said or written?

    Remember that Ernst Zundel won against the fabrications that saw him taken to court for “spreading false news” but was then threatened with the new human rights laws because his two 1984-5 and 1988 trials for the first and last time proved the “Holocaust” narrative does not stand up to legal scrutiny, and so the new Human Rights twisted law needed to be used so that the loudest Holocaust survivor liars gained legal protection for telling lies in court.

    Think on these things.