An image grab from a video released by the Houthi movement allegedly shows two Saudi light armoured vehicles (LAVs) destroyed by the rebels in an August offensive in the Kitaf district in northern Yemen. Radio Canada International could not independently confirm the location of the photo, but experts consulted by RCI identified the vehicles as LAVs produced by General Dynamics Land Systems – Canada at their plant in southern Ontario. (Houthi Military Media/Handout)

Footage of Canadian LAVs in Yemen raises new questions about Saudi arms deal

Share

Images of what appear to be Canadian-made light armoured vehicles (LAV) captured or destroyed by Houthi rebels during recent fighting in the borderlands between Yemen and Saudi Arabia are triggering fresh calls for Ottawa to cancel its multibillion arms deal with Riyadh.

Critics of the $15-billion deal to supply Saudi Arabia with the latest model of LAVs say, if proven authentic, these images not only show once again that Canadian arms are being used by the Saudi forces in the bloody conflict in Yemen, but also illustrate the danger of them being diverted to other groups and militias, contravening Ottawa’s obligations under the UN Arms Trade Treaty.

Video footage and still images released by the Houthis on Sunday appear to show at least five damaged or destroyed LAVs of various models produced by General Dynamics Land Systems – Canada (GDLS-C) in London, Ontario, along with other armoured vehicles and large quantities of light weapons and ammunition.

The materials released by the Iran-backed Houthi movement also show five damaged Spartan armoured personnel carriers produced by the Canadian-owned Streit Group, which is now based in the United Arab Emirates.

The Houthis claim the footage, an edited compilation of several videos, shows the results of a major 72-hour military offensive by their forces against the Saudi-led coalition.

Conflicting claims

A Houthi fighter is seen near a Canadian-made LAV captured from Saudi forces in Kitaf, northern Yemen, in August. (Houthi Military Media/Handout)

Brig.-Gen. Yahya Saree, a Houthi military spokesman, told the Al Masirah TV that the operation began in August with an ambush on the Yemeni side of the border and developed into a full-blown cross-border attack into Saudi Arabia’s southeastern Najran province.

Saree claimed the rebels inflicted hundreds of casualties on the Saudi-led forces and captured thousands of prisoners, including “large numbers of commanders, officers and soldiers of the Saudi army.”

There were also large numbers of prisoners who were not Saudi nationals, he told the Houthi-run Al Masirah TV. Footage released by the Houthis shows soldiers in Saudi military uniforms and fighters in civilian clothing dropping their weapons and raising their hands as they surrender.

Saudi Arabia has dismissed the Houthi claims that thousands of its troops have surrendered to the rebels as part of a “misleading media campaign.”

Col. Turki al-Malki, a spokesperson for the Saudi coalition, told reporters on Monday that in late August the coalition thwarted a Houthi attack in the Kitaf district of Saada province near the border with Saudi Arabia.

Arms maker declines to comment on footage

A Canadian-made LAV is seen burning in a still image released by the Houthi rebels in Yemen. (Houthi Military Media/Handout)

Doug Wilson-Hodge, a spokesman for General Dynamics Land Systems-Canada, told Radio Canada International the company is declining to comment on the footage.

However, experts consulted by Radio Canada International identified the vehicles in the still images and the video released by the Houthis as Canadian-produced LAV-25s and a Bison armoured personnel carrier, which is also based on the LAV-25 platform.

Four of the five LAVs were reported to have been captured or destroyed in Kitaf and the fifth one in the district of Wadi al-Faraa.

Radio Canada International could not independently confirm this information.

It’s also unclear whether the vehicles were operated by regular Saudi forces or whether they were transferred to pro-government Yemeni forces that fight against the Houthis as part of the Saudi-led coalition.

Violation of UN Arms Trade Treaty?

The burnt-out shell of a Canadian-made LAV is seen in this still image released by the Houthi movement. (Houthi Military Media/Handout)

Former Bloc Quebecois MP and University of Montreal law professor Daniel Turp, who in 2016 launched legal action to force Ottawa to cancel its export permit for the LAVs, said arms sales to Saudi Arabia are inconsistent with Canada’s legal obligations under the UN Arms Trade Treaty, especially given the evidence of their use by Saudi forces in Yemen.

Under Canada’s amended Export and Import Permits Act (EIPA), which came into force on Sept. 1, the minister of foreign affairs has to assess if the export of arms or defence technology would undermine peace and security, or could be used to commit or facilitate serious violation of international humanitarian or human rights law or be used against women and children.

Under Article 11 of the ATT, Canada is also obliged to take measures to prevent diversion of its arms exports to third parties, Turp said.

“It’s clear that there has been diversion given that these LAV-25s were captured by the Houthis,” Turp said.

Global Affairs Canada did not respond to Radio Canada International’s request for comment in time for publication.

However, Global Affairs officials have said in the past that they are reviewing export permits to Saudi Arabia and no final decision has been made. No new permits have been issued while this review is on-going, officials have said.

New legal challenge

Turp was part of a group of civil society and human rights groups that called on Ottawa to halt arms exports to Saudi Arabia on Sept. 17, when Canada officially became part of the UN arms trade treaty.

Turp said he plans launch another legal challenge in the Federal Court next week to force Ottawa to cancel the export permits for the new LAVs and upgrades to the older models.

His previous attempts to have the Federal Court stop the export of LAVs were unsuccessful.

However, Turp said Canada’s accession to the ATT creates a new legal basis for his court challenge of the LAV sale to Saudi Arabia.

The images of Canadian LAVs captured by the Yemen rebels provide another argument for the challenge, demonstrating that arms sales to Saudi Arabia not only contravene Articles 6 and 7 of the treaty, but also Article 11, which deals with diversion of arms exports, Turp said.

Diversion or combat losses?

An image grab from a video released by the Houthi movement shows a Canadian-made LAV allegedly captured by Houthi fighters in the Kitaf district of northern Yemen in late August. (Houthi Military Media/Handout)

The Liberal government approved the controversial deal, signed by the previous Conservative government, to supply the Islamic Kingdom with hundreds of LAV 6.0 advanced combat vehicles in 2016.

According to a declassified 2016 memo prepared by Global Affairs Canada for then foreign affairs minister Stephane Dion and released by the government with several redactions following Turp’s legal challenge, GDLS-C had applied for six new permits worth about $11 billion dollars for the new LAV 6.0 variants, as well as upgrade kits for the older versions, such as the LAV-25s.

The number of new LAVs Saudi Arabia wants to purchase and their associated armaments are redacted out in the memo.

However, between 1993 and 2015, the federal government granted GDLS-C permits to export more than 2,900 LAVs and their associated weapons systems, including automatic canons, assault guns, mortars and anti-tank missiles, the memo said.

The memo also discussed the issue of Canadian equipment exported to Saudi Arabia falling into the hands of Houthi rebels following media reports of a rebel fighter who was photographed with a Canadian LRT-3 sniper rifle.

According to the memo, by 2016 more than 1,300 Canadian sniper rifles were exported to Saudi Arabia. The Canadian embassy in Riyadh concluded at the time that the rifle, along with other Saudi military equipment, was likely captured by Houthi fighters during military operations along the Saudi-Yemen border.

“This type of battlefield loss of equipment is to be expected as result of military operations,” the memo said.

According to Global Affairs Canada statistics, Saudi Arabia was the largest non-U.S. export destination for Canada’s defence industry in 2018, receiving approximately $1.2 billion in Canadian military exports.

That accounts for nearly 62 per cent of the total value of non-U.S. military exports by Canadian defence companies, according to the annual Report on Exports of Military Goods from Canada published by Global Affairs.

Share
Categories: International, Politics
Tags: , , , ,

Do you want to report an error or a typo? Click here!

@*@ Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available

Note: By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that Radio Canada International has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Radio Canada International does not endorse any of the views posted. Your comments will be pre-moderated and published if they meet netiquette guidelines.

Netiquette »

When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don’t always think alike—and that’s precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it’s important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1. RCInet.ca’s online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. RCInet.ca reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3. RCInet.ca’s online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in five languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish or in one of the two official languages, English or French. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  10. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  11. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International  is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  12. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  13. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International  forums is prohibited.
  14. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  15. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  16. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  17. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  18. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

*

5 comments on “Footage of Canadian LAVs in Yemen raises new questions about Saudi arms deal
  1. Avatar Unbiased says:

    Why aren’t issues like this making it to our election coverage?

    And our support for sanctions against Venezuela etc.

  2. Avatar Sandy says:

    Hmmm The Saudi’s are using the LAV’s in Saudi Arabia….Just like they promised they only would….The Houthi General stated: “developed into a full-blown cross-border attack into Saudi Arabia’s southeastern Najran province.” The Houthi’s seem to be pretty media savvy. Don’t you think he would have said “in Yemen” if he wanted to stir up the arms sales controversy? Kind of makes your story mute.

  3. Avatar Ghost Ship says:

    Who would want to buy these mobile deaths traps that can be reduced to heaps of junk so readily by an irregular force. If the arms “market” was rational nobody would ever buy another one of these as an armoured fighting vehicle again and anyone who had bought them would hand all the owned over to the police as a tool of oppression.

    • Avatar Bugs Bunny says:

      That’s the whole point of a LAV (Light Armoured Vehicle). It is better than lugging all your stuff while wearing body armour to get somewhere.

    • Avatar Sandy says:

      The vehicles are only one piece of the puzzle. You need the right troops, the right tactics and the right situation to avoid being destroyed. Even the mighty American M1 Tank can be destroyed in the right situation. The vehicles design is fine, although appear to be an older generation of LAV’s without some of the upgrades to design that makes them safer. Many countries in the world are actually going to designs similar to the LAV rather than tracked light armoured personnel carriers….for your consideration.