The Canadian diabetes association is calling for a new federal tax on sugary drinks because of epidemic levels of Type 2 diabetes. Professor Charlebois says a better policy would be to clearly indicate the amount of added sugar on all processed food so consumers could see the amount of sugar and make their own choices

The Canadian Diabetes Association is calling for a new federal tax on sugary drinks because of epidemic levels of Type 2 diabetes. Professor Charlebois says a better policy would be to clearly indicate the amount of added sugar on all processed food so consumers could see the amount of sugar and make their own choices
Photo Credit: Rich Pedroncelli/Associated Press-via CBC

Sugar drink tax: OK, but perhaps not the best way to reduce obesity, diabetes

Share

This week, the Canadian Diabetes Association (CDA) has called on the Canadian government to levy a tax on soft drinks.

The Association says the high sugar content contributes to obesity and to the ever–increasing rate of diabetes.

Sylvain Charlebois is skeptical that taxing the drinks to discourage consumption is the best strategy. He is a professor in food distribution and policy at the University of Guelph’s Food Institute, in Guelph Ontario.

Listen
Sylvain Charlebois is a professor in food distribution and policy at the University of Guelph’s Food Institute, in Guelph Ontario
Sylvain Charlebois is a professor in food distribution and policy at the University of Guelph’s Food Institute, in Guelph Ontario © U Guelph

In its own effort to combat skyrocketing obesity and diabetes, one of the highest in the world, Mexico had added a 10 percent tax on soft drinks. The study cited by the Canadian Diabetes Association showed that as a result, soft drink consumption declined by six percent in the ten month period studied..

Other jurisdictions, France, Finland, Hungary, Barbados, Romania, and some American states, have also increased taxes on such beverages to discourage sugar intake.

Professor Charlebois says that while studies show that soft drink consumption may decline, there is little evidence that sugar consumption, which is the problem, is also declining.

He cites an earlier study which said that limiting soft drinks only reduced calorie intake by a miniscule amount. The suggestion is that if people are discouraged from buying soft drinks because of the cost, they may simply seek a sugar fix in other products, thereby negating any health benefit from the soda pop tax.

Professor Charlebois points out that targetting only soft drinks leaves out the vast selection of other products with added sugar, from fruit drinks, chocolate milk, to almost all processed foods. which people may seek out as alternatives for their sugar fix.
Professor Charlebois points out that targetting only soft drinks leaves out the vast selection of other products with added sugar, from fruit drinks, chocolate milk, to almost all processed foods. which people may seek out as alternatives for their sugar fix. © CBC

Other studies (additional information links below) show that the effect of added taxation wears off over time.

Statistics show that even without a tax, Canadians are consuming fewer and fewer soft drinks every year, on average a drop of four percent per year. He says targetting a specific product with an added tax is somewhat misguided pointing out that a vast number of products consumed every day have often substantial amounts of added sugar.

Professor Charlebois says the better policy would be to ensure proper labelling in clear-understandable terms (ie not scientific names)- indicating the amount of added sugar in a product.

He says consumers are becoming wiser and are reading content labels more and more and with proper labelling laws, consumers can make their own decisions on whether to buy certain products.

Additional information

Share
Categories: Economy, Health, International, Internet, Science and Technology, Society
Tags: , , ,

Do you want to report an error or a typo? Click here!

@*@ Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available

Note: By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that Radio Canada International has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Radio Canada International does not endorse any of the views posted. Your comments will be pre-moderated and published if they meet netiquette guidelines.

Netiquette »

When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don’t always think alike—and that’s precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it’s important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1. RCInet.ca’s online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. RCInet.ca reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3. RCInet.ca’s online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in five languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish or in one of the two official languages, English or French. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  10. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  11. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International  is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  12. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  13. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International  forums is prohibited.
  14. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  15. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  16. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  17. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  18. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

*

One comment on “Sugar drink tax: OK, but perhaps not the best way to reduce obesity, diabetes
  1. Avatar david says:

    This will do nothing to reduce the incidence of diabetes. All it will do is increase taxes on an already burdened taxpayer! I’m sure the doctors and highly paid executives of these agencies can easily afford to absorb new taxes but the rest of us cannot! Stop trying to make changes to lifestyle by upping the taxes we pay. Stick to education programs. Oh I forgot if your current education programs were working you would not have to increase my taxes! So clearly you don’t know what you’re doing and are relying on penalties to force people to follow your lead. But we are not following your lead are we? We don’t make $100,000 a year in salaries where you can pay an extra 10% for a cold drink! While you’re at it you might as well tax fruits drinks – but that’s likely your next step! THE WORLD IS RUN BY VERY FOOLISH PEOPLE.