The statue of early French explorer Samuel de Champlain has become controversial in Orillia, Ontario. (Google streetview)

Another statue controversy in Canada: Samuel de Champlain

The 17th century French explorer Samuel de Champlain has long been lauded in Canadian history books as opening up Canada through his travels into the then unexplored interior of the country.

In the quiet and picturesque city of Orillia, Ontario, a statue of the French explorer commissioned in 1915 to mark the 300th anniversary of the arrival of Europeans in Ontario has now joined many other statues to Canadian historical figures which have become controversial.

Indeed an original plaque notes the monument was “erected to commemorate the advent into Ontario of the white race”.
The almost 4-metre tall bronze statue shows the French explorer in full court dress atop a base flanked on one side by two Indigenous people looking up to a Jesuit priest, and on the other, two more looking up at a fur trader.

Although located in Orillia, the statue and land around it are controlled by Parks Canada which had it removed for repair and the base and steps removed as they were crumbling.  The original intent was to then reconstruct it.

Unveiled in 1925, the bronze statues were removed and the crumbling monument was taken down in 2017 with the intention to rebuild anew. Parks Canada decided to hold off as Champlain became controversial in light of Indigenous feelings toward the historical context and federal government expressions of reconciliation with Indigenous peoples (Google streetview)

That was delayed when objections were raised saying the monument was offensive and racist towards Indigenous peoples.

About 60 people gathered at the former site on July 1, Canada Day, to express their opposition to the statue.Quoted in, a member of the Chippewas of Rama First Nation, Kathy Brooks, said Champlain and the monument to him, represent “racism, oppression, genocide and colonialism” and shows the Indigenous people cowering.

A local historian disagrees saying that interpretation is “misunderstood”.

After deliberation, Orillia city council has voted to ask Parks Canada to return the statues and rebuild the monument but with an “expanded interpretation”  as an opportunity to educate people not only about the good, but also the bad.  Such an interpretation would reflect historical context and better portray Indigenous people.

A final decision on whether the statue will be returned and if so , in what form, remains with Parks Canada. In a statement reported by Global News, Parks Canada stated it is “committed to working respectfully with Indigenous Peoples and honouring their contributions to Canada’s protected places”.

There are several bronze monuments to Samuel de Champlain in Canada, notably one in Ottawa where the sculptor had added a handle to Champlain’s early-type of astrolabe navigational tool (which they didn’t have) and also has it upside down.

There are several monument’s to Champlain in Canada, including this one in Ottawa at Nepean Point. Unfortunately the sculptor didn’t know much about early Astrolabe’s, having added a non-existent handle, and with the explorer holding it incorrectly.( Radio-Canada, Martin Vanasse)

Additional information-sources

(the story has been modified on July 19,2019 to indicate that it was Orillia city council that has asked Parks Canada to rebuild the monument. A working group called the Champlain Monument Working Group had not yet submitted their recommendation at the time of writing)

Categories: Indigenous, Politics, Society
Tags: , , , , , , ,

Do you want to report an error or a typo? Click here!

@*@ Comments

Leave a Reply

Note: By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that Radio Canada International has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Radio Canada International does not endorse any of the views posted. Your comments will be pre-moderated and published if they meet Netiquette guidelines.

When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don’t always think alike—and that’s precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it’s important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1.’s online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3.’s online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in five languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish or in one of the two official languages, English or French. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  10. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  11. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International  is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  12. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  13. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International  forums is prohibited.
  14. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  15. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  16. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  17. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  18. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


2 comments on “Another statue controversy in Canada: Samuel de Champlain
  1. Avatar tina Yuthers says:

    What about the huge lake just south of you?

  2. Avatar Edward Schweikert says:

    Another group POed about something! I am POed about my father’s treatment to me as growing up! [My lack of temporary birthmark(stork bite) and his declaration as my step father.] I still carry his last name except on phony! (Is this name real?)