Demonstrators on Parliament Hill in June 2012 called on the government to reverse cuts to refugee health care. Such protests have become an annual event.

Demonstrators on Parliament Hill in June 2012 called on the government to reverse cuts to refugee health care. Such protests have become an annual event.
Photo Credit: Fred Chartrand/Canadian Press

Restore health care for refugees, demand doctors

“This government is treating some very vulnerable people in a very cruel and unjust way,” says Dr. Meb Rashid, co-chair of Canadian Doctors for Refugee Care. The group organized events in 20 Canadian cities to protest cuts to the health care made available to refugee and refugee claimants.

ListenFor about 50 years until 2012, those seeking asylum in Canada had access to free basic health care including doctor visits, diagnostic and lab tests, prescription drugs and emergency dental and vision care.

Doctors say cuts do not save money

The immigration minister argued that failed claimants and those from what Canada deems to be safe countries like the U.S. or European countries were “bogus” claimants and should not receive “better health care than Canadians receive.” Denying them such services would save $80-million over four years.

Doctors and other health specialists say that is not the case because people who can’t get treatment get sicker and cost more to treat once their conditions get worse. And Rashid says one study indicates a Toronto children’s hospital has received higher admissions linked to the new policy.

Dr. Meb Rashid calls government cuts to refugee health care coverage inhumane, unjust and costly.
Dr. Meb Rashid calls government cuts to refugee health care coverage inhumane, unjust and costly.

Court called cuts ‘cruel and unusual’

In a scathing ruling last July, a Federal Court judge declared that the cuts to health care for asylum seekers was unconstitutional and constituted “cruel and unusual treatment.” Subsequently the government restored some free care for children and some pregnant women, but Canadian Doctors for Refugee Care say that failed to fully comply with the court order to restore care. They add asylum seekers and even doctors are confused over what is covered and what is not.

One refugee claimant who was tortured and sexually assaulted was initially denied medical tests for pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases, says Rashid, giving an example of the effects of the changes in coverage. Another, he says, was denied a test for malaria, which is a life-threatening disease.

Government ‘fighting to preserve cuts’

The Canadian government will appeal the Federal Court decision and the doctors’ group denounces the fact that it is spending “1.4 million (and counting) fighting to preserve the cuts.”

Nurses, pharmacists, doctors, and refugee advocates took part in the day’s events to demand the government restore the health care cuts. Pressure has also come from provincial health ministers and 20 health groups including the Canadian Medical Association which represents the country’s doctors.

‘Inhumane and costly’

“This government has been very intransigent,” says Rashid. “Our obligation is to speak out for a population which has tremendous challenges speaking out for themselves.”

Rashid says the government’s policy on health care for asylum seekers “is not only inhumane” but very costly. Restoring the old system would benefit them, but also the communities that receive them and Canadian society as a whole.

Categories: Health, Immigration & Refugees, Politics, Society

Do you want to report an error or a typo? Click here!

@*@ Comments

Leave a Reply

Note: By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that Radio Canada International has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Radio Canada International does not endorse any of the views posted. Your comments will be pre-moderated and published if they meet Netiquette guidelines.

When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don’t always think alike—and that’s precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it’s important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1.’s online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3.’s online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in five languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish or in one of the two official languages, English or French. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  10. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  11. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International  is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  12. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  13. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International  forums is prohibited.
  14. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  15. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  16. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  17. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  18. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *