The beautiful Avro Arrow above Canada’s Niagara (Horseshoe) Falls on one of its test flights.
Photo Credit: RCAF-DND

Canada History Feb 20, 1959; Death of a national dream

Share

It was truly a “black Friday”.

The date was February 20th, 1959.  It was sudden, it was unexpected, it was brutal. An announcement from Canada’s Parliament that Friday immediately affected thousands of workers at the AV Roe aerospace plant near Toronto and the repercussions have lasted ever since.

But to start at the beginning, which was 1953, the Cold War was now well-established between the West and the Communist Soviet Union.

The threat of Soviet bombers crossing the Arctic into North American airspace was very real and the Royal Canadian Air Force wanted a new and better interceptor.  However, the call for tenders “AIR 7-3”  was for a jet not just “better” than current technology but with specifications no current manufacturer thought was even possible.

The specs said the all-weather interceptor should be capable of Mach 1.5 at 50,000 ft, and be capable of operating anywhere from 100 degrees Fahrenheit above freezing, to 100 degrees F below freezing.

A.V. Roe had been working on new fighters design including a delta wing since 1951 and now accepted this incredible 1953 challenge It began feverishly working on an entirely new concept like no fighter ever before.

You Tube- first flight of Arrow (8min)

In just four short years, the engineers and machinists and designers would create what was arguably the fastest and most advanced fighter jet in the world with capabilities that even against today’s fighter jets would be impressive, capable of flying faster and farther for example than the new F-35 over 50 years later.

On October 4, 1957, the CF-105 “Avro Arrow” was revealed to the public. Although stunning it should have made national headlines, and even world news, but unfortunately it was the same day that the Soviets launched Sputnik into Earth orbit which overshadowed the Arrow’s debut.

Nevertheless, the Arrow, registered as RL-201, took to the skies in March 1958 and immediately impressed its test pilots.

A few CF-105’s had been built and as test flights continued, they repeatedly showed astounding potential using existing engines. That potential was expected to increase greatly with the almost completed and better performing Canadian-designed Orenda Iroquois engine.

RL-205 painted with dayglo orange nose, tail, and wingtips. shown on its first and only flight before it was ordered chopped up. Note: most people think the Arrow was a single-seat fighter, but in fact it was designed to include a navigator located behind the pilot with only a tiny round porthole to look out of. (Note this famous photo may in fact be RL-201, retouched to show RL-205. In its first (and only) flight 205 would have kept its landing gear in the down position. © RCAF

Test pilots loved the plane, and chief test pilot Jan Zurakowski said it was the best plane he’d ever flown.

The Arrow could go from idle on the runway, to Mach 0.92 in just 90 seconds, and operating from its own hanger, be completely refueled and rearmed in just six minutes.

It was also the world’s first “fly-by-wire” technology.

At the time, it should be noted that breaking the sound barrier (Mach-1) had only begun to be achieved by fighter jets in level flight by about the mid 1950’s

The new Arrow (RL-201) reached Mach-1 with its “current technology” Pratt and Whitney J75  engines during a steep climb on its third flight. The rate of climb was over 38,000 ft/min while it was estimated with the much better Canadian Orenda would be over 44,000 ft/min.

The incredibly beautiful and potentially world-beating Arrow rolled out for public debut on a sunny day in October 1957. © CF- DND

Although the specs called for a speed of Mach 1.5, RL-202 reached Mach 1.98 in November 1958.

It seemed Canada had left the world’s leading jet manufacturers wobbling far behind in the Arrow’s jet stream.

The Avro accomplishment seemed amazing, until Black Friday

It was on this day that Canada’s then Prime Minister John Diefenbaker, rose in Parliament and announced the sudden halt to the CF-105 Avro Arrow jet fighter and Orenda- Iroquois engine programmes, effective immediately.  This was allegedly due to increasing costs overruns, mostly due to the RCAF upper echelons  which kept changing specifications and requirements.

There was also the possibly self-serving issue of the American counterpart to our Defence Minister George R. Pearkes, who told Pearkes that Canada didn’t need to be building aircraft because the US had lots of fighters and could protect the skies in a crisis. With the Soviet satellite “Sputnik” venture into space, the rocket and missile race was on, leading to the attitude being tossed about that manned fighters would fade away as missile interceptors were the way of the future.

The Toronto Telegram newspaper on Feb 20, 1959 announcing the headline that the Arrow project was scrapped.

The cost overruns were due in part to the changing designs for the plane’s top of line weapons systems to be provided by the US. First designed for the Hughes/Falcon, the RCAF wanted the Sparrow/Astra system under development in the US. This required a major overhaul and redesign. When the Sparrow/Astra was cancelled, the Americans relented and agreed to give the Hughes/Falcon technology to Canada.

Many point out that the American aircraft industry had a great deal to lose if Canada’s much better interceptor reached the international market.

Then came another astounding, and unbelievable order.

Arrow RL-206 has just been built and was slated to try for the world speed and altitude records.  In what is still considered a brutal, unnecessary, highly unusual, controversial and mysterious move, the five flying Arrows, and the just finished RL-206, were ordered destroyed.  Not only all planes, but all jigs, all special tools, everything was ordered destroyed. Luckily photos and films survived, along with other documentation, and event some parts that were smuggled out as souvenirs by some of the employees.

Empty workstations, jigs, tools and components of the Arrow left in place as stunned workers went home after the devastating news of Black Friday © Avro Aircraft

With the announcement some 14,000 AV Roe employees lost their jobs along with an equal number in subcontracted equipment suppliers.

To this day, conspiracy theories about American involvement to end the Canadian project abound. They concern allegations that American aerospace companies did not want competition for sales from a much superior interceptor from Canada, and that they were also eager to hire away the brilliant engineers who created the Arrow.

HERITAGE MINUTE

It is true that the cancellation of the CF-105 soon caused the demise of the A.V Roe company and that many of the Canadian engineers were in fact hired by US aerospace firms and by NASA. Many design features on subsequent US fighters can be traced to the Arrow, while former A.V.Roe employees also helped develop the US space programme.

The repercussions for Canada were enormous  as the cancellation also effectively ended Canada’s likelihood of ever becoming a major and leading player in the aerospace industry.

There was huge secrecy over the order to destroy the Arrows and no reporters allowed near the Avro plant. One wily reporter however hired a small plane to fly over the site capturing this incredible photo of the planes in the process of being chopped up. ©  via Vintage Wings

In 1996 a three-hour miniseries about the Arrow debacle was created for the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation and starred Dan Akroyd. It is listed as having the highest viewership ever for a CBC programme.

A quick search on the internet reveals about a dozen books written on and about the Arrow, including “who killed the Arrow”,  “Fall of an Arrow”, “Cold war combat jet”,  “Revolutionary Airplane”, “the Impossible Dream” and many others.

To this day, mention of the Arrow to anyone of a certain age, or to aircraft enthusiasts  can still stir up strong emotions and debate

(that show 3hrs, is avail on YouTube)

YouTube Documentary

Additional information- sources

Share
Categories: Economy, International, Internet, Science and Technology, Politics, Society
Tags: , , , , , ,

Do you want to report an error or a typo? Click here!

@*@ Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available

Note: By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that Radio Canada International has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Radio Canada International does not endorse any of the views posted. Your comments will be pre-moderated and published if they meet netiquette guidelines.

Netiquette »

When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don’t always think alike—and that’s precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it’s important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1. RCInet.ca’s online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. RCInet.ca reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3. RCInet.ca’s online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in five languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  10. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  11. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International  is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  12. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  13. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International  forums is prohibited.
  14. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  15. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  16. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  17. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  18. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

*