Dozens of animal rights activists are seen at a southern Alberta farm engaged in what they are called a liberation lockdown for turkeys this fall. It is this kind of protest that farmers have been asking governments to legislate against (Cranbrook Friends of Animals Society)

Ontario moves to protect farmers from protesters

Today Ontario’s Minister of Agriculture, Ernie Hardeman, introduced a bill they’ve been considering for several months. This comes in response to complaints about animal rights groups trespassing on farms.

The Security From Trespass and Protecting Food Safety Act, 2019  was introduced in the Ontario legislature today where it has passed first reading.  It comes as a result of complaints and fears from the farming and processing industries related to disruptions by animal rights groups.

The bill proposes heavier fines for trespassing  on farms or food processing plants from the current maximum of $10,000, to a new level of $15.000 for a first offence, and up to $25,000 for subsequent offences.

Animal rights activist Anita Krajnc gave water to a pig in a truck in June 2015 in Burlington, Ontario.. She was charged with mischief for interfering with the truck and animals and appeared in a Burlington, Ontario court. The charges were dismissed in 2017. That would likely not be the case under the new bill (Ho-Elli Garlin/Canadian Press)

The government says the bill is to address risks associated with trespass on farms, the purpose being to:

(a)  eliminate or reduce the unique risks that are created when individuals trespass on those properties or interfere with farm animals, including the risk of exposing farm animals to disease and stress as well as the risk of introducing contaminants into the food supply;

(b)  protect farm animals and the food supply chain from the risks described in clause (a);

(c)  protect the safety of farmers, their families and persons working in or on farms, animal processing facilities and prescribed premises as well as the safety of drivers of motor vehicles transporting farm animals; and

(d)  prevent any adverse effects the risks described in clause (a) may have on Ontario’s overall economy.

The Bill if passed would also make it illegal to stop, hinder, obstruct or interfere with a motor vehicle transporting farm animals; and prohibit interacting with farm animals being transported by a motor vehicle without explicit prior consent.

The Bill came about after a series of discussions late last year with various stakeholders in the agri-food industry. The government said it has also received hundred of letters about trespassing on farms and processing plants and interference with livestock transport trucks.

Cam Houle owns and operates a dairy farm near Osler, Sask. He wrote an opinion piece for the CBC saying that farmers “that feed our country are bullied, insulted and threatened” (Chanss Lagaden/CBC)

In a press release, Keith Currie, President of the Ontario Federation of Agriculture said, “We appreciate the support of the Ontario government in taking the concerns of Ontario livestock and poultry farmers seriously and acting swiftly to address them. Farmers implement biosecurity measures to protect against unwanted diseases as well as stress on our farm animals”.

The law would also make it illegal to gain access to a farm under false pretenses theoretically putting undercover filming liable to the increased fines, and charges could be laid up to two years after an incident, increased from the current six month limit.

Animal rights groups reacted by saying the bill appears to be deliberately targeting them and infringes on their rights to protest. The animal rights group PETA released a statement this afternoon in response. “In the 21st century, “ag-gag” bills, such as Ontario Bill 156 and Alberta Bill 27, have become the latest desperate attempt by agriculture-industry bullies to protect themselves from public scrutiny, conceal the crime of animal abuse, and prevent consumers from learning the truth about the way animals in the meat and dairy industries live and die. PETA has fought similar legislation across the United States, and 19 states saw how dangerous “ag-gag” laws were and rejected them. Ontario and Alberta should be ashamed that they have so much to hide, even from their own citizens”.

Additional information-sources

Categories: Economy, Environment, Politics, Society
Tags: , , , ,

Do you want to report an error or a typo? Click here!

@*@ Comments

Leave a Reply

Note: By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that Radio Canada International has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Radio Canada International does not endorse any of the views posted. Your comments will be pre-moderated and published if they meet Netiquette guidelines.

When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don’t always think alike—and that’s precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it’s important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1.’s online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3.’s online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in five languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish or in one of the two official languages, English or French. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  10. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  11. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International  is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  12. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  13. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International  forums is prohibited.
  14. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  15. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  16. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  17. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  18. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


3 comments on “Ontario moves to protect farmers from protesters
  1. Avatar Marcus Bernacci says:

    Well this is a bit biased journalism if I’ve ever seen one…

  2. Avatar alana says:

    This law will basically allow “farmers” to do what ever they want to completely defenceless, totally controlled and constrained intelligent mammals – this will not be an easy law .. people have a right to know how people who use animals to make money treat those animals – painting animal rights activists and terrorists is absurd – I have been to protests consisting mainly of old women — it’s ridiculous to criminalize the act of bearing witness to the last days totally defenceless animals will have on this planet – i truly hope that decent people will rise up to protect our freedom of expression and right to information and freedom of conscience – animals are not ours to use – we share the planet with them – expect resistance from the grannies.

  3. Avatar Kerry Baker says:

    In other words keep consumers ignorant of the cruelty inherent in animal agriculture. The industry now relies on cruel methods as the business model.