This body wash contains microbeads, which have replaced more natural exfoliants such as oatmeal and crushed nut shells. The microscopic beads are aslo found in some toothpastes
Photo Credit: ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENCE/NDP

Plastic microbeads- a toxic substance in waterways-from the Great Lakes to the Arctic

Share

They are very tiny beads usually made of polyethylene, which is a very common plastic used for example, to make plastic bags.

The microbeads are found in a wide variety of facial scrubs, body gels, and in toothpaste to act as an abrasive to scrub dead skin cells, or cleaning teeth.

null
Microbeads range in size from 0.0004 to 1.24 mm, making them too small to be filtered out by wastewater treatment plants. They absorb toxins and then can be eaten by fish mistaking them for food. They then accumulate the toxins, which accumulate further up the food chain, or the plastic can sit in the gut of fish and birds causing slow starvation. © 5 Gyres Institute

Philippe Van Cappellen is a Canada Excellence Research Chair and professor of Earth and Environmental Sciences in the Faculty of Science at the University of Waterloo in Ontario.  On the university website he is quoted saying, “ We know more and more about ocean plastics, but, paradoxically, we have little information on the distribution and fate of plastic debris in the Great Lakes, the world’s largest freshwater resource,”

null
In 2014, McGill University biologist Anthony Ricciardi says they checked ten locations along a 320Km stretch of the St Lawrence river and found microbeads in the sediment in numbers as high as 1000 beads per litre of sediment © cbc

A review article by Van Cappellen and fellow researchers from Waterloo’s Ecohydrology Research Group appears as an open source publication in this month’s issue of the Journal of Great Lakes Research.

The University of Waterloo study says the problem is much bigger than thought. Among the Great Lakes, it found the highest concentration in Lake Erie and that certain areas of the Great Lakes have suspended plastics concentrations as high as those found in the so-called garbage patches accumulating within large oceanic gyres.

The microbeads are so tiny they bypass the water treatment process and so are released with treated water back into the environment.

Health Canada currently lists the beads as safe for cosmetics and in toothpastes (possible consumption)

However, along with other plastic garbage that breaks down into smaller and smaller pieces, they absorb toxins and then are mistakenly eaten by fish or shellfish, which in turn are eaten by birds which absorb the toxins or can be eaten by bigger fish which can end up on our plates.

There have also been cases where the plastic get lodged in fish and animal guts, blocking them so the creature dies of starvation.

Read more: killed by plastic.

Read more : Plastic fibres from clothes washed into environment

Read more : Plastic and microbeads Great Lakes

null
As technology has improved to detect them, there is a realization that plastic microbeads are a growing problem worldwide and can be found in concentrations as high as the plastic bits in the ocean gyres. © CBC

Environmental groups have been sounding the alarm for years now about plastic debris in the oceans

Now a member of the federal New Democratic Party, (NDP) wants the government to declare the beads as a toxic substance. Megan Leslie’s motion says, the microbeads “could have serious harmful effects and therefore the government should take immediate measures to add microbeads to the list of toxic substances managed by the government under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act.”

The NDP’s Megan Leslie says it’s time for Ottawa to act. “It would be better to have a piece of federal legislation or regulation because otherwise we’re going to end up with this patchwork. Manitoba does this but Nova Scotia doesn’t allow that. It’s easier if we just do it at the federal level.”

The issue was debated this week in the House of Commons with the Conservative Party government saying Environment Canada is studying the dangers posed to wildlife and the environment by the plastic microbeads.

“The findings of the study will determine a federal-provincial action plan on the tiny beads”, said Colin Carrie, the parliamentary secretary to Environment Minister Leona Aglukkaq.  “The chemical management plan brought forth by our government will prioritize microbeads for assessment, which will benefit all Canadians,” Carrie told the House of Commons on Tuesday.

He added  “Our government supports including the issue of microbeads on the agenda of the Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment meeting this summer.”

A 2014 study in the Arctic  showed the microbeads have travelled into the farthest reaches of the polar region.

The authors from the US Dartmouth University and the University of Plymouth in the UK say, “Our findings indicate that microplastics have accumulated far from population centers and that polar sea ice represents a major historic global sink of man-made particulates. The potential for substantial quantities of legacy microplastic contamination to be released to the ocean as the ice melts therefore needs to be evaluated,”

In the US, the New Jersey governor this week signed a bill banning the manufacture and sale of microbeads. Illinois has also banned microbeads, and nine other US states are considering similar measures.

Share
Tagged with: , , , , ,
Posted in Environment, Health, Indigenous, Internet, Science and Technology, Politics, Society

Do you want to report an error or a typo? Click here!

@*@ Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available

Note: By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that Radio Canada International has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Radio Canada International does not endorse any of the views posted. Your comments will be pre-moderated and published if they meet netiquette guidelines.

Netiquette »

When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don’t always think alike—and that’s precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it’s important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1. RCInet.ca’s online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. RCInet.ca reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3. RCInet.ca’s online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in five languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  10. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  11. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International  is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  12. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  13. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International  forums is prohibited.
  14. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  15. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  16. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  17. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  18. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

*