In southern B.C, greenhouses once producing food are switching to cannabis. One company alone, Canopy Growth, is planning 275,000 sq metres of production (Lien Yeung- CBC).

Food or cannabis? Farming questions in Canada

Share

When the Liberal government of Canada legalised recreational use of cannabis late last year, it created a whole new industry virtually overnight.

One aspect has been a massive rise in greenhouse building and conversion of former manufacturing plants into commercial grow-ops.

But questions were quietly being raised about whether the potential lucrative crop would replace food growing farm operations.

Up until recently almost all commercial cannabis has been grown indoors, primarily for security reasons.

But of course a substantial percentage of Canadian vegetables have long been grown in greenhouses as well.  Now, several former massive greenhouses which only a year ago provided bell peppers, tomatoes and other food crops have since been converted to producing the drug crop. .

Where once, tonnes of food tomatoes were produced at an operation just north of Montreal, now cannabis will replace the food. (CNW-Canopy Growth)

But indoor operations are expensive in terms of power consumption for heat and light, and now there’s a move to expand to field production.

Some 13 companies have been granted licences to grow outdoors.  The production is still small, at about 10 per cent of cannabis production, but more permits for field production are expected.

Once north America’s largest producer of pink tomatoes, the 700,000 sq fr Serres Bertrand operation will produce cannabis instead. (CNW-Canopy Growth)

In southern Ontario for example, a 27 acre field has been converted from asparagus, to now growing the drug crop instead. In Quebec, a major greenhouse operation recently converted the majority of its tomato production to marijuana.

In southern British Columbia, over a quarter of the greenhouse space in the region is on land reserved for agricultural use but no longer produces food in favour of cannabis.

A large 27 acre plot of outdoor cropland in Ontario which once provided asparagus, now will produce cannabis instead (WeedMD)

The mayor of Delta, an area long known for its agricultural output, is quoted in The Tyee saying, “ We are under attack by the pot industry for greenhouses”.

The provincial Agricultural Land Commission in May changed the rules to allow cannabis crops to be considered as “agricultural use”.

The concern is that municipalities now can’t protect land for food production, or greenhouses from being converted.

The drop in regional food production has been substantial.  Harold Steves is one of the architects of the province’s Agricultural Land Reserve (ALR) which had been created to preserve farmland from development. In The Tyee he says in the 1970’s  provincial farms provided 86 per cent of the produce consumed in British Columbia, but today that number has shrunk to 45 per cent.

The question is a growing one, to what extent should farmland and greenhouse operations be allowed to stop producing food in favour of the drug crop?

If the trend continues, other questions Canadians might ask are, to what extent will lesser domestic food production affect food costs, and will Canada have to rely more on foreign food imports?

Additional information-sources

Share
Categories: Economy, Environment, Health, Internet, Science and Technology, Politics, Society
Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Do you want to report an error or a typo? Click here!

@*@ Comments

Leave a Reply

Note: By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that Radio Canada International has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Radio Canada International does not endorse any of the views posted. Your comments will be pre-moderated and published if they meet netiquette guidelines.

Netiquette »

When you express your personal opinion in an online forum, you must be as courteous as if you were speaking with someone face-to-face. Insults and personal attacks will not be tolerated. To disagree with an opinion, an idea or an event is one thing, but to show disrespect for other people is quite another. Great minds don’t always think alike—and that’s precisely what makes online dialogue so interesting and valuable.

Netiquette is the set of rules of conduct governing how you should behave when communicating via the Internet. Before you post a message to a blog or forum, it’s important to read and understand these rules. Otherwise, you may be banned from posting.

  1. RCInet.ca’s online forums are not anonymous. Users must register, and give their full name and place of residence, which are displayed alongside each of their comments. RCInet.ca reserves the right not to publish comments if there is any doubt as to the identity of their author.
  2. Assuming the identity of another person with intent to mislead or cause harm is a serious infraction that may result in the offender being banned.
  3. RCInet.ca’s online forums are open to everyone, without regard to age, ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation.
  4. Comments that are defamatory, hateful, racist, xenophobic, sexist, or that disparage an ethnic origin, religious affiliation or age group will not be published.
  5. In online speak, writing in ALL CAPS is considered yelling, and may be interpreted as aggressive behaviour, which is unpleasant for the people reading. Any message containing one or more words in all caps (except for initialisms and acronyms) will be rejected, as will any message containing one or more words in bold, italic or underlined characters.
  6. Use of vulgar, obscene or objectionable language is prohibited. Forums are public places and your comments could offend some users. People who use inappropriate language will be banned.
  7. Mutual respect is essential among users. Insulting, threatening or harassing another user is prohibited. You can express your disagreement with an idea without attacking anyone.
  8. Exchanging arguments and opposing views is a key component of healthy debate, but it should not turn into a dialogue or private discussion between two users who address each other without regard for the other participants. Messages of this type will not be posted.
  9. Radio Canada International publishes contents in five languages. The language used in the forums has to be the same as the contents we publish or in one of the two official languages, English or French. The usage of other languages, with the exception of some words, is forbidden. Messages that are off-topic will not be published.
  10. Making repetitive posts disrupts the flow of discussions and will not be tolerated.
  11. Adding images or any other type of file to comments is forbidden. Including hyperlinks to other websites is allowed, as long as they comply with netiquette. Radio Canada International  is in no way responsible for the content of such sites, however.
  12. Copying and pasting text written by someone else, even if you credit the author, is unacceptable if that text makes up the majority of your comment.
  13. Posting any type of advertising or call to action, in any form, to Radio Canada International  forums is prohibited.
  14. All comments and other types of content are moderated before publication. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to refuse any comment for publication.
  15. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to close a forum at any time, without notice.
  16. Radio Canada International  reserves the right to amend this code of conduct (netiquette) at any time, without notice.
  17. By participating in its online forums, you allow Radio Canada International to publish your comments on the web for an indefinite time. This also implies that these messages will be indexed by Internet search engines.
  18. Radio Canada International has no obligation to remove your messages from the web if one day you request it. We invite you to carefully consider your comments and the consequences of their posting.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 characters available

*

3 comments on “Food or cannabis? Farming questions in Canada
  1. Avatar Alex DuBois says:

    It is a basic tenant of real estate that it will always be used for its “highest” use, no pun intended. This is no different than someone taking a single family home and converting it to an apartment building. The other basic idea in western culture is that of private property ownership. If someone owns a piece of property they should be able to use it for whatever purpose they want, so long as they keep within the applicable zoning. Since cannabis is a crop there is really no difference in growing cannabis vs growing tomatoes. Both are a crop and both have a market. The primary difference is that cannabis is a more valuable crop. More money into a community will result in a higher tax base and increased prosperity for everyone.

  2. Avatar Peter Ashcroft says:

    Cannabis can become a dangerous addiction and put pressure on your health service. This will result in more pressure on your budget.

  3. Avatar Barry Kuypers says:

    Bona fide farmers should be able to grow this agricultural crop wherever they choose on their farm land . this is another opportunity for often struggling farmers to make a living and support their families . Small farmers (Crafters) have built theses markets . All these greenhouses will be back to producing the most valuable crops after the cannabis market gets to a point of saturation and becomes only another agricultural crop .. This unused greenhouse space will soon be filled with farmers able to try new crops with the major cannabis speculators paying most of the capitol cost to build .
    Canadian Farmer